Understanding complex clinical reasoning in infectious diseases for improving clinical decision support design

Abstract

BackgroundClinical experts’ cognitive mechanisms for managing complexity have implications for the design of future innovative healthcare systems. The purpose of the study is to examine the constituents of decision complexity and explore the cognitive strategies clinicians use to control and adapt to their information environment.MethodsWe used Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) methods to interview 10 Infectious Disease (ID) experts at the University of Utah and Salt Lake City Veterans Administration Medical Center. Participants were asked to recall a complex, critical and vivid antibiotic-prescribing incident using the Critical Decision Method (CDM), a type of Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA). Using the four iterations of the Critical Decision Method, questions were posed to fully explore the incident, focusing in depth on the clinical components underlying the complexity. Probes were included to assess cognitive and decision strategies used by participants.ResultsThe following three themes emerged as the constituents of decision complexity experienced by the Infectious Diseases experts: 1) the overall clinical picture does not match the pattern, 2) a lack of comprehension of the situation and 3) dealing with social and emotional pressures such as fear and anxiety. All these factors contribute to decision complexity. These factors almost always occurred together, creating unexpected events and uncertainty in clinical reasoning. Five themes emerged in the analyses of how experts deal with the complexity. Expert clinicians frequently used 1) watchful waiting instead of over- prescribing antibiotics, engaged in 2) theory of mind to project and simulate other practitioners’ perspectives, reduced very complex cases into simple 3) heuristics, employed 4) anticipatory thinking to plan and re-plan events and consulted with peers to share knowledge, solicit opinions and 5) seek help on patient cases.ConclusionThe cognitive strategies to deal with decision complexity found in this study have important implications for design future decision support systems for the management of complex patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0221-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Supporting novice clinicians cognitive strategies: System design perspective

“…Our results agree with the findings from the cognitive sciences literature concerning naturalistic decision-making, heuristics, uncertainty management and affective computing [15–19]. The cognitive strategies used by novice clinicians may be supported by some currently available tools, as discussed in the following paragraphs:…”

Automated symptom and treatment side effect monitoring for improved quality of life among adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster, randomized, controlled trial

“…Our study findings are in conflict with prior studies demonstrating positive effects of automated monitoring in diabetes and chronic pain (non-diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain) using IVR [24][25][26][27][28]. side effects), physicians may tend toward more conservative treatment strategies or intentional under-dosing [29][30][31][32]. Our effort to minimize physician burden may have weakened the potential impact of the intervention.…”

“…symptoms) are considered more acceptable than outcomes that are induced by treatment (e.g. side effects), physicians may tend toward more conservative treatment strategies or intentional under-dosing [29][30][31][32]. In the absence of highly effective treatments, the impact of interventions to improve use of existing treatments on physician prescribing is likely to be limited.…”

Big-Data Based Decision-Support Systems to Improve Clinicians' Cognition

“…11, 12 Dual Process Theory (DPT) has associated clinical reasoning with System 1 (nonanalytical) and System 2 (analytical) cognitive processes. 13 Metacognition represents another cognitive measure clinicians use to consciously regulate if a correct diagnosis is difficult to make.…”