2000
DOI: 10.2307/3250979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several IS researchers have relied on some of Klein and Myers' principles to validate their qualitative research. Davidson (2002), Gallivan (2001), Hanseth et al (2001), Henfridson and Holmstrom (2002), and Trauth and Jessup (2000) are some examples. Because their set of principles applies mostly to hermeneutics and not all interpretive studies follow a hermeneutical philosophical base, Klein and Myers recommend that other IS authors, representing other forms of interpretivism, suggest additional principles.…”
Section: Criteria For Critical Interpretive Is Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several IS researchers have relied on some of Klein and Myers' principles to validate their qualitative research. Davidson (2002), Gallivan (2001), Hanseth et al (2001), Henfridson and Holmstrom (2002), and Trauth and Jessup (2000) are some examples. Because their set of principles applies mostly to hermeneutics and not all interpretive studies follow a hermeneutical philosophical base, Klein and Myers recommend that other IS authors, representing other forms of interpretivism, suggest additional principles.…”
Section: Criteria For Critical Interpretive Is Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Gopal and Prasad (2000) propose a set of criteria particularly adapted for evaluating symbolic interactionist work, arguing that this research differs from other social constructionist genres, notably hermeneutics and ethnography. A number of IS interpretive researchers-like Davidson (2002), Schultze (2000, Trauth and Jessup (2000), and Walsham and Sahay (1999)-have used Golden-Biddle and Locke's three criteria for ethnographic writing (which does not exclude hermeneutics), as the basis for evaluating their research.…”
Section: Criteria For Critical Interpretive Is Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that this might lead to alternative conceptualizations of IS and their effects (such as what Trauth and Jessup [2000] did regarding group decision support systems). A critical theory of IS will also provide a means to explore both large-scale innovations (such as ICT infrastructure studies) and small-scale deployments (such as work group and organizational implementations).…”
Section: Avgerou: Ict and Global Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS researchers have embraced the critical approach as a viable and adequate alternative to study IT problems (e.g., (Orlikowski and Baroudi 1991;Trauth and Jessup 2000;Richardson and Robinson 2007;Stahl and Brooke 2008). The critical approach allows for a departure of the purely descriptive approaches commonly used in IS.…”
Section: Approach and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%