2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11465-016-0392-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding coupled factors that affect the modelling accuracy of typical planar compliant mechanisms

Abstract: In order to accurately model compliant mechanism utilizing plate flexures, qualitative planar stress (Young's modulus) and planar strain (plate modulus) assumptions are not feasible. This paper investigates a quantitative equivalent modulus using nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) to reflect coupled factors in affecting the modelling accuracy of two typical distributed-compliance mechanisms. It has been shown that all parameters have influences on the equivalent modulus with different degrees; that the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is valid because all links are considered coplanar and the efforts are applied in the links plane. If these hypotheses were not verified, other assumptions should have been taken into account [78]. For all optimization rounds, in order to obtain a smoother layout without checkerboards problem, a filtering procedure is used that consists in the modification of the density variables assigned to the elements with the information of its neighborhoods as was proposed in [79].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is valid because all links are considered coplanar and the efforts are applied in the links plane. If these hypotheses were not verified, other assumptions should have been taken into account [78]. For all optimization rounds, in order to obtain a smoother layout without checkerboards problem, a filtering procedure is used that consists in the modification of the density variables assigned to the elements with the information of its neighborhoods as was proposed in [79].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accurately perform analytical modeling, the equivalent modulus of the compliant plates is required. 26 The ranges of the parameters of the compliant plates are listed in Table 1 and the optimization of the parameters is presented in the “Parameters optimization” section. The equivalent modulus of the compliant plates depends on the width-to-thickness ( b / t ) ratio.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the plate modulus of the material E'=E/(1-ν2) ( E is the Young’s modulus and ν is the Poisson’s ratio) is used as the equivalent modulus. 26,27 Table 2 lists the parameters, c1n and c2n ( n = 1,2,…,8). 18…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deviation between the theoretical model and finite element model (FEM) in terms of compliance (the reciprocal of stiffness) may be caused by the improper assumption about the stress-strain state. 32 The theoretical model is based on the planar stress assumption which may be not proper because the leaf springs in the SPLCM are usually under spatial loads. According to Hao's analysis in Hao et al 32 and the specific parameters of the leaf spring, the difference between the forces under no planar assumption and planar stress assumption may be about 6%-8%, which is close to the compliance error between the theoretical model and FEM.…”
Section: Static Analysis Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%