Understanding factors critical to the implementation of ehealth in chronic disease management: a realist review protocol

Abstract

IntroductionCanadians are living longer, many with multiple chronic conditions. This population of older, frail Canadians continues to grow in size as do concurrent demands for community-based, outpatient and ambulatory models of care. Ideally, a multifaceted, proactive, planned and integrated care model includes ehealth. Although several factors are known to facilitate the implementation of ehealth in chronic disease management (CDM), for example, adequate support, usability, alignment of programme objectives, there is a growing body of inconclusive evidence on what is critical for implementation. We aim to achieve a fulsome understanding of factors critical to implementation by conducting a realist review—an approach suitable for understanding complex interventions. Our proposed review will identify factors critical to the implementation of ehealth in CDM (heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes (type 1 or 2)) without limitations to care setting, language, publication year or geography. Findings will be presented in configurations of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes (CMOs).Methods and analysisA search strategy will be iteratively developed based on the concepts of ‘implementation’ and ‘adoption’ of ‘ehealth’ interventions used within ‘CDM’ to identify the peer-reviewed and grey literature published before 31 March 2021 from five databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsychInfo) on ehealth interventions actively involving a healthcare provider for CDM among adults. Data extraction and synthesis will be guided by Realist and Meta-review Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines informing core concepts of CMOs, and a study output will include a middle-range-theory describing the implementation of ehealth in CDM.Ethics and disseminationFindings will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. A multistakeholder (patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and practitioners, decision-makers and policy-makers) perspective will be used in our dissemination approach. No formal ethics approval is required for this review.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020208275.

Intervenções Cognitivo-Comportamentais Baseadas Na Internet Autoguiadas Para Adolescentes: Uma Revisão

“…The interventions focus primarily on the most common mental health symptoms in adolescents -anxiety and depression -and a worrying cause of death in this group -suicide (PAHO, 2018). But they also aim to help in cyberbullying, a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly common among young people (Mohseny et al, 2020), and in improving psychological well-being in clinical conditions, in line with e-Health interventions, which are growing rapidly (Shahid et al, 2021).…”

Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis

“…Importantly, these tools are also accessible and potentially relevant for users other than patients, such as health care professionals and informal caregivers [ 21 , 22 ]. Recently, eHealth tools have been put forward as a viable alternative supporting health care professionals in providing evidence-based care, for example, by reinforcing information and interventions provided to the patients and providing easier access and support to the health care professional themselves [ 23 , 24 ].…”