2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding failure response in service discovery systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research described in [15] presents an alternative approach to extend the limit of Zeroconf beyond the local link. Here, the robustness of existing discovery mechanism is evaluated under increasing failure intensity.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Results: Timely Service Discovery Of All Servimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research described in [15] presents an alternative approach to extend the limit of Zeroconf beyond the local link. Here, the robustness of existing discovery mechanism is evaluated under increasing failure intensity.…”
Section: Scenario 3 Results: Timely Service Discovery Of All Servimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create a Tahoe-LAFS Introducer on a node, basic configuration parameters are introduced (the grid name, the node name and optionally 15 https://www.tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs if the default value is inadequate for some reasons the port the service will be listening to). As soon as the service is started, if it is marked as public, it is announced to the rest of Cloudy nodes.…”
Section: Real Use Case Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research described in [12] is closely related to the topic of this paper. Here, the robustness of existing discovery mechanisms is evaluated under increasing failure intensity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pervasive environments can have many service providers providing services with similar functionality but possessing different criteria. The different criteria [2] that influence the service selection in pervasive environments are availability [3], cost [4], reliability [5,6], capability [3], mobility [7], responsiveness [8], trust [3,9] and locality [7]. Users, who require a service, will be requested to provide their preferences for the criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%