2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Haemophilus parasuis infection in porcine spleen through a transcriptomics approach

Abstract: Background: Haemophilus parasuis (HPS) is an important swine pathogen that causes Glässer's disease, which is characterized by fibrinous polyserositis, meningitis and arthritis. The molecular mechanisms that underlie the pathogenesis of the disease remain poorly understood, particularly the resistance of porcine immune system to HPS invasion. In this study, we investigated the global changes in gene expression in the spleen following HPS infection using the Affymetrix Porcine Genechip™.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we notied that, although the patterns of differential expression of the examined genes were qualitatively similar between microarray and qPCR analysis (which shows the reliability of our microarray analysis), the fold changes obtained by the two approaches differed. We reasoned that this may be due to the greater accuracy of quantitation provided by qPCR compared with microarraysor to differences in the scope of magnitude of measurement of the two techniques [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we notied that, although the patterns of differential expression of the examined genes were qualitatively similar between microarray and qPCR analysis (which shows the reliability of our microarray analysis), the fold changes obtained by the two approaches differed. We reasoned that this may be due to the greater accuracy of quantitation provided by qPCR compared with microarraysor to differences in the scope of magnitude of measurement of the two techniques [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fold changes obtained by qRT-PCR were much more or less than those obtained in the microarray. This may be due to the greater accuracy of quantitation provided by qRT-PCR in comparison to microarrays, the differences in the dynamic range of the two techniques, and the lack of specificity in the primers designed to discriminate gene family members at the level of primary screening by DNA arrays 19. However, the trends were same between the results of two methods, showing the reliability of the microarray analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CEBPB gene product controls the expression of IL6, IL8 and other acute phase genes [89]. The CEBPB regulatory factor was among those genes up-regulated in porcine spleen upon Haemophilus parasuis infection [47]. The SPI1 gene product (PU.1) is well-known as a transcription factor controlling hematopoesis and stimulation of gene expression during the immune response [90], [91], including the TLR4 gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%