2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding how single-atom site density drives the performance and durability of PGM-free Fe–N–C cathodes in anion exchange membrane fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Fe0.5, they are in good qualitative agreement with the reported decrease of the amount of FeNxCy sites and the concomitant increase of Feoxides, as observed by 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy on another Fe-N-C material based on singleatom-sites, before/after a 100 h durability test at 600 mA cm -2 in air/H2 AEMFC. [68] We also stress that while the reprecipitation of Fe as Fe oxide during AST was quantitatively limited for Fe0.5 in liquid alkaline electrolyte, the outcome in an ionomeric environment free of support liquid electrolyte (stronger increase in local Fe concentration in the ionomer phase) is expected to favour the reprecipitation of leached Fe cations as Fe oxide. [61] The question now arises whether the release of Fe cations in the electrolyte was caused or simply accelerated by the corrosion of the carbon matrix.…”
Section: Fe Redistribution At the Electrode  Electrolyte Interfacementioning
confidence: 77%
“…For Fe0.5, they are in good qualitative agreement with the reported decrease of the amount of FeNxCy sites and the concomitant increase of Feoxides, as observed by 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy on another Fe-N-C material based on singleatom-sites, before/after a 100 h durability test at 600 mA cm -2 in air/H2 AEMFC. [68] We also stress that while the reprecipitation of Fe as Fe oxide during AST was quantitatively limited for Fe0.5 in liquid alkaline electrolyte, the outcome in an ionomeric environment free of support liquid electrolyte (stronger increase in local Fe concentration in the ionomer phase) is expected to favour the reprecipitation of leached Fe cations as Fe oxide. [61] The question now arises whether the release of Fe cations in the electrolyte was caused or simply accelerated by the corrosion of the carbon matrix.…”
Section: Fe Redistribution At the Electrode  Electrolyte Interfacementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The results at different times of operation show a reduction in the local IEC values in the cathode CL and in the membrane close to the cathode catalyst layer. This reduction indicates a degradation of the ionomeric materials, which is based on lower hydration levels at the cathode and causes performance decay over time, as previously discussed. ,,,, Thus, cathode ionomer and membrane degradation might be the reason for the observed degradation products in IC analysis. Back diffusion of water from the anode to cathode might compensate for low hydration levels at the cathode, but even for high water diffusivity values, lower hydration levels were observed at the cathode. ,,, Change in the anode catalyst to a PtRu material as carried out in recent AEMFC studies might improve the water level at the cathode due to the enhanced kinetics of the hydrogen oxidation reaction and thus produce more water that can diffuse to the cathode. , Also, the volumes of sampled exhaust water differ between the anode and the cathode side (Tables S3–S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, the model calculates the chemical degradation kinetics of the ionomeric materials in the anode and cathode CLs and the membrane, whose local kinetics is set by the local water content. The model can predict the performance and performance stability of AEMFCs (time changes in IEC, represented by the hydroxide ion concentration). ,, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) have historically suffered from low performance and durability, they have seen a surge in performance over the past few years, with several research groups advancing their achievable peak power density, current density, and longevity. State-of-the-art AEMFCs are now able to achieve peak power densities of 3.5 W cm –2 operating on H 2 /O 2 and 1.75 W cm –2 operating on H 2 /air (CO 2 -free). ,,, These advances have been possible because of new reactor engineering that carefully manages the quantity and distribution of cell water as well as the emergence of high-performance anion exchange membranes (AEMs), anion exchange ionomers (AEIs), , and efficient electrocatalysts. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%