2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2006.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding “Internet plagiarism”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, it is impossible to prevent students from having the possibility of using information that does not belong to them by assigning their name. In the educational activity the students work with different activities, exercises, tests or solutions to problems and all the information is just a few clicks away (Atkins & Nelson, 2001;DeVoss & Rosatti, 2002;Moore Howard, 2007). The Internet has been divided into all aspects of our lives, including university classrooms, and has opened up new ways of finding solutions for class assignments.…”
Section: Higher Education and Plagiarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, it is impossible to prevent students from having the possibility of using information that does not belong to them by assigning their name. In the educational activity the students work with different activities, exercises, tests or solutions to problems and all the information is just a few clicks away (Atkins & Nelson, 2001;DeVoss & Rosatti, 2002;Moore Howard, 2007). The Internet has been divided into all aspects of our lives, including university classrooms, and has opened up new ways of finding solutions for class assignments.…”
Section: Higher Education and Plagiarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, y teniendo en cuenta que bajo el ciberplagio subyace la cultura digital, tendríamos que cambiar la ARTÍCULOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN mirada y replantearnos cómo gestionar la información y cómo utilizarla. En algún momento tendremos que entenderlo, resituándolo en lo que se ha denominado desde 1996 por el New London Group nuevas alfabetizaciones (Kalantzis & Cope, 1997;Lankshear & Knoble, 2003Kress, 2007Kress, , 2010, o el iText (Howard, 2007), la cultura juvenil que surge de la misma cultura digital (Sefton-Green, 1998;Hutchby & Moran-Ellis, 2001;Bernal & Angulo, 2013;Colás, González & de-Pablos, 2013) el sentido rizomático de identidad individual (Boyd, 2007;López y Angulo, 2015) y la mezcla informacional (Sonvilla-Weiss, 2010). El uso exclusivo de estrategias punitivas o la aplicación de software antiplagio (Ma, Wan & Lu, 2008) no resuelve el problema.…”
Section: Conclusiones Y Discusiónunclassified
“…While these initiatives demonstrate institutional concern over the impact of plagiarism on the intellectual production of universities, their credibility as centers of excellence producing quality knowledge and human resources is also at stake. Yet, dealing with problems of academic integrity at the university has called for broad approaches to education and pedagogy (Howard 2007, Power 2009, Bretag 2013. One of the issues on plagiarism among students, for example, is that while detection software may reduce this practice (Davis and Carroll 2009), the use of this tool alone is not sufficient to eliminate the practice at universities.…”
Section: Integrity -Combined Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%