2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding optimal data gathering in the energy and latency domains of a wireless sensor network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others consider latency constraints to meet time sensitive requirements [4] [5]. An aggregation with both of the factors is more general but has not been considered yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others consider latency constraints to meet time sensitive requirements [4] [5]. An aggregation with both of the factors is more general but has not been considered yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximizing network lifetime can also be expressed similarly as maximizing the amount of data transmitted from sensor nodes to sinks [6][7][8] . In [9], the routing problem is formulated as multiple mathematical programming models from simple to complex based on different network performance. In [10], the routing problem is formulated as a nonlinear programming model and lagrangian relaxation is used to achieve the optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are essential drawbacks of geographical approaches which can be listed as follows: requiring complex calculations at nodes, depending on the MAC-layer (e.g., IEEE 802.11), being susceptible to local-minima, possessing inability to go around voids, and reliability. Moreover, frequently changing topologies harden the problem mentioned above [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%