2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research with English language learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, two participants chose not to attend the stimulated recall sessions. To account for my dual role of participant and researcher, I asked colleagues in a research group to read my data and comment on it as "critical friends" (Sowa, 2009). The feedback from these colleagues was extremely valuable in opening up interpretations I had not considered.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, two participants chose not to attend the stimulated recall sessions. To account for my dual role of participant and researcher, I asked colleagues in a research group to read my data and comment on it as "critical friends" (Sowa, 2009). The feedback from these colleagues was extremely valuable in opening up interpretations I had not considered.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, scholars also note the challenges research creates for teachers, with time being an ever-pressing constraint upon the process (Borg, 2007;Massey et al, 2009;Sowa, 2009;Tavakoli & Howard, 2012) as teachers attempt to balance the needs of their classrooms and their research (Li, 2006) and try to shape their learning into suitable representations for the academic community (Smiles & Short, 2006).…”
Section: Teacher Research: Benefits Challenges and Unknownsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features are also borne out by the present case study. The second article worth mentioning (Sowa 2009) shares even more significant similarities with this one: the goal was also to teach AR to preservice teachers who were pursuing an MEd in the professional area of Englishlanguage education. Important differences, however, distinguish the two studies, especially concerning the number of students that took part in each master's course (50 in my case, eight in Sowa's), and also the specific context of English-language education (English as a foreign language, in this case; English as a second language, in Sowa's).…”
Section: Introduction: Meta-action Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against the negative trend emphasized by Van Sluys (2010, 141), my students and I were actually both the subjects and the objects of our research; both researchers and researched subjects. As in Sowa (2009Sowa ( , 1027, AR also formed part of the syllabus of the module, one of the goals of which was to teach AR. As stated in the academic guide, the subject was mainly devoted to, 'familiarizing pre-service teachers with different innovation practices in education, i.e.…”
Section: Introduction: Meta-action Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%