2015
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Poverty Reduction in Sri Lanka: Evidence from 2002 to 2012/13

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total expenditures on Samurdhi-Sri Lanka's flagship antipoverty program-fell from 0.87 percent to 0.14 percent of GDP between 2001 and 2012 (figure 9.2). Indeed, if the size of the Samurdhi program had not declined but had instead remained unchanged from 2002 to 2009/10, poverty would have been 1.5 percentage points lower, leading to about a 10 percent greater reduction in poverty (Ceriani, Inchauste, and Olivieri 2015).…”
Section: H a P T E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total expenditures on Samurdhi-Sri Lanka's flagship antipoverty program-fell from 0.87 percent to 0.14 percent of GDP between 2001 and 2012 (figure 9.2). Indeed, if the size of the Samurdhi program had not declined but had instead remained unchanged from 2002 to 2009/10, poverty would have been 1.5 percentage points lower, leading to about a 10 percent greater reduction in poverty (Ceriani, Inchauste, and Olivieri 2015).…”
Section: H a P T E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total expenditures on Samurdhi -Sri Lanka's flagship antipoverty program-fell from 0.87 percent to 0.14 percent of GDP between 2001 and 2012 (figure 2). Indeed, if the size of the Samurdhi program had not declined but had instead remained unchanged from 2002 to 2009/10, poverty would have been 1.5 percentage points lower, leading to about a 10 percent greater reduction in poverty (Ceriani, Inchauste, and Olivieri 2015).…”
Section: Direct Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%