Understanding Predictive Processing. A Review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the Predictive Processing framework (hereinafter PP) and to identify its basic theoretical difficulties. For this reason, it is, primarily, polemic-critical and, secondarily, historical. I discuss the main concepts, positions and research issues present within this framework ( §1-2). Next, I present the Bayesian-brain thesis ( §3) and the difficulty associated with it ( §4). In §5, I compare the conservative and radical approach to PP and discuss the internalist nature of the generative model in the context of Markov blankets. The possibility of linking PP with the free energy principle (hereinafter FEP) and the homeostatic nature of predictive mechanisms is discussed in §6. This is followed by the presentation of PP's difficulties with solving the dark room problem and the exploration-exploitation trade-off ( §7). I emphasize the need to integrate PP with other models and research frameworks within cognitive science. Thus, this review not only discusses PP, but also provides an assessment of the condition of this research framework in the light of the hopes placed on it by many researchers. The Conclusions section discuss further research challenges and the epistemological significance of PP.

Body as first teacher: The role of rhythmic visceral dynamics in early cognitive development

“…Predictive processing theories have come to dominate the philosophical and scientific landscape over the past decade. Much like embodied cognition, predictive processing is something of an umbrella term capturing a range of positions that vary in their scope and ambition (for helpful overviews, see Hohwy, 2020a;Piekarski, 2021;Wiese & Metzinger, 2017). We focus our attention here on active inference (Parr et al, 2022), a computational framework developed under the free energy principle (Friston et al, 2006;Friston & Stephan, 2007).…”

Embodied Cognition and Imagination in Sport. A Review of the Handbook of Embodied Cognition and Sport Psychology

“…Chapter 24 explores the application of the predictive processing framework (cf. Clark, 2016;Piekarski, 2021) to the study of saccadic eye movements. The chapter focuses on the predictive capabilities of these eye movements, which play a crucial role in the intelligent recognition of object features in the context of interaction (cf.…”

Motivation, counterfactual predictions and constraints: normativity of predictive mechanisms

“…Before going any further, it is necessary to justify why the notion of normativity is important for the explanation of the predictive processing framework (PP). 8 According to this framework brains are predictive machines (entailing generative models), whose primary function is to constantly match information coming from sensory modalities to internally generated, model-based predictions explaining the nature and sources of such information (for full exposition see: Clark, 2013;Hohwy, 2013Hohwy, , 2014Hohwy, , 2020aPiekarski, 2021;Wiese & Metzinger, 2017). The process of minimizing prediction errors, i.e.…”