Understanding Prevention Networks in a Local Government Area: Insights From a Social Network Analysis Among Western Australian Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Prevention Programs

Abstract

This study aimed to use systems thinking tools to understand network relationships to inform discussions, policy, and practice to improve nutrition, physical activity, and overweight/obesity prevention activities in a Western Australian local government area. An audit of nutrition, physical activity, and obesity prevention activities was conducted, and identified organizations were invited to participate in an organizational network survey. Social network analysis (SNA) determined the extent to which organizations shared information, knowledge, and resources; engaged in joint program planning; applied for and shared funding; and identified operational barriers and contributors. SNA data were mapped and analyzed using UCINET 6 and Netdraw software. Five organizations within the network were identified as core; the remainder were periphery. The strongest networks were sharing information, and the weakest was funding. The connections were centralized to one organization, enabling them to readily influence other organizations and network operations. Remaining organizations indicated limited partnership across the networks. Strengthened collaborations and partnerships are essential to health promotion, as they extend reach and organizational capabilities. This study provides a process for undertaking network analysis, identifying leverage points to facilitate communication and information sharing, and reorienting of collaborations and partnerships to consolidate scarce resources and act strategically within a bounded area. There is a need for stronger relationships between organizations and a reorientation of partnerships to facilitate resource sharing within the local government area, to improve nutrition, physical activity, and obesity prevention practices. SNA can assist in understanding organizational prevention networks within a bounded area to support future planning of practices and policy.

Obesity contagion among classmates: Children's relation with each other regarding weight status, physical activity, and dietary intake

“…The positive relationship between BMI and social ties is consistent with the results of studies conducted among students from the same school or community ( Asirvatham et al, 2014 ; Lim & Meer, 2018 ; Loh & Li, 2013 ; Nie et al, 2015 ). Network interventions use social networks to accelerate behavioral change, which is believed to be more effective than non-network alternatives ( Hene et al, 2022 ; Jancey et al, 2023 ; Polman et al, 2023 ; Valente, 2012 ). As suggested by several obesity treatment and simulation studies, focusing on broader social ties is an effective strategy ( Bahr et al, 2009 ; Daw et al, 2015 ; Leahey et al, 2015 ; Lower-Hoppe et al, 2022 ).…”

Follow the Arrows: Using a Co-Created Causal Loop Diagram to Explore Leverage Points to Strengthen Population Physical Activity Promotion in British Columbia, Canada

“…In terms of stronger Political Leadership, this is common refrain in health promotion, NCD prevention, and PPAP research, particularly for multisectoral coordination, and the findings from this project add to the chorus. 18,[25][26][27][28][29] For example, Baugh Littlejohns et al 16 found the lack of political and health system leadership was a fundamental factor in the challenges to health promotion policy and practice in South Australia. Fostering political leadership was reported to be essential to implementing the most promising active transportation initiatives in a study by Stankov et al 30 In terms of political leaders and public health, de Leeuw 31 suggests that "they are torn between promises and deliverables where electoral futures are at stake.…”

A scoping review of systems approaches for increasing physical activity in populations

“…Understanding the types and functions of networks, and the role that key actors play, is considered useful for understanding where and how to intervene in a system [36,37]. It has the potential to help identify influential leaders who may be champions for the intervention; leverage existing network capacity for information, policy or change diffusion [38]; and identify where existing networks may need to be formed or strengthened to improve the implementation of interventions [38,39].…”