2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding repeatability and plasticity in multiple dimensions of the sociability of wild female kangaroos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, repeatability scores reported for migration, mate preference, and parental behaviours were on average less than 0.3, whereas week-to-week repeatability values observed in this study ranged from 0.4 to 0.6, with. Consistent individual differences in social network position were previously shown in only a few populations where social behaviour was studied in a conspecific context (e.g., Jacoby et al 2014; Menz et al 2017; O’Brien et al 2018), including a study on our system, which noted inter-individual differences and reported similar repeatability in great tit social strategies (group size: R = 0.43-0.64, degree: R = 0.46-0.61, association strength: R = 0.41-0.64) in a single-species context (Aplin et al 2015). Here, we extend findings of studies on single-species systems by showing that individuals vary in their heterospecific social associations in much the same way as was previously reported within species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, repeatability scores reported for migration, mate preference, and parental behaviours were on average less than 0.3, whereas week-to-week repeatability values observed in this study ranged from 0.4 to 0.6, with. Consistent individual differences in social network position were previously shown in only a few populations where social behaviour was studied in a conspecific context (e.g., Jacoby et al 2014; Menz et al 2017; O’Brien et al 2018), including a study on our system, which noted inter-individual differences and reported similar repeatability in great tit social strategies (group size: R = 0.43-0.64, degree: R = 0.46-0.61, association strength: R = 0.41-0.64) in a single-species context (Aplin et al 2015). Here, we extend findings of studies on single-species systems by showing that individuals vary in their heterospecific social associations in much the same way as was previously reported within species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Hence, a key first step in relating fitness consequences to social network position is to understand the distribution and consistency of individual variation in behaviour by characterising individual interaction patterns and social phenotypes. Consistency in social behaviour is often assumed, but only a few studies have shown that individuals can express consistent social phenotypes, by repeatedly measuring and comparing their mebehaviour over larger time spans (Blumstein et al 2013; Jacoby et al 2014; Aplin et al 2015; Menz et al 2017; O’Brien et al 2018). Whether individuals also express consistent social strategies in a multi-species context is yet to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…beetles, Bolitotherus cornutus 22 ; guppies 23 ; great tits, Parus major 24 ). But barring a few exceptions (kangaroos, Macropus giganteus 25 ; great tits 10 ), these results tend to be based on two or fewer years of data. Information regarding the consistency of social isolation across longer portions of the lifespan are needed, especially in long-lived species, in order to reveal how social isolation may impact lifetime biological success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Reproductive state also influences association decisions in female kangaroos (Menz, Goldizen, Blomberg, Freeman, & Best, 2017), and rhesus macaques, M. mulatta (Brent, MacLarnon, Platt, & Semple, 2013).…”
Section: Females' Priorities and Sociabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As females cycle through reproductive states, and care for offspring of differing ages, their requirements change (Gittleman & Thompson, 1988) and this may cause changes in their association patterns. Indeed, association patterns have been linked to females' reproductive state in eastern grey kangaroos (Menz, Goldizen, Blomberg, Freeman, & Best, 2017), mountain goats, Oreamnos americanus , and rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta (Brent, MacLarnon, Platt, & Semple, 2013). Female giraffes with juveniles have been observed to associate and form crèche groups, in which one female protects the offspring while the others go off to feed or drink (Langman, 1977; M. Castles and A. Goldizen, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Females' Sociabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%