2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the CDM's contribution to technology transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
79
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature (Dechezleprêtre, Glachant, and Ménière, 2008;UN-FCCC, 2010), technology transfer is particularly common in large projects implemented in rapidly growing developing countries that have already reached relatively high levels of technological prowess, in some cases through previous CDM project implementation. Moreover, the literature suggests that the CDM promotes technology transfer through multiple channels, including institutional support and enhanced commercial viability of clean technology projects (Schneider, Holzer, and Hoffmann, 2008). Our primary contribution to this literature is a theoretical and empirical analysis of interactive effects between the technology's commercial value and the recipient country's absorptive capacity: we show that countries with high absorptive capacity receive advanced, commercially important renewable energy technologies less often than countries with low absorptive capacity.…”
Section: The International Political Economy Of Technology Transfermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…According to the literature (Dechezleprêtre, Glachant, and Ménière, 2008;UN-FCCC, 2010), technology transfer is particularly common in large projects implemented in rapidly growing developing countries that have already reached relatively high levels of technological prowess, in some cases through previous CDM project implementation. Moreover, the literature suggests that the CDM promotes technology transfer through multiple channels, including institutional support and enhanced commercial viability of clean technology projects (Schneider, Holzer, and Hoffmann, 2008). Our primary contribution to this literature is a theoretical and empirical analysis of interactive effects between the technology's commercial value and the recipient country's absorptive capacity: we show that countries with high absorptive capacity receive advanced, commercially important renewable energy technologies less often than countries with low absorptive capacity.…”
Section: The International Political Economy Of Technology Transfermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, research on technology transfer occurring through Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects focuses on the transfer of hardware and physical installations and only very superficially recognizes the knowledge dimension of technology (Schneider et al 2008;Bell 2012). Similarly, in the policy discussions under the UNFCCC, one understanding (or position) promoted by developed country negotiators, most importantly the European Union, understands technology transfer as the geographical relocation of technology embodied in physical goods, installations, industrial machinery and equipment, which ultimately causes a net reduction in GHGs.…”
Section: Conceptual Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is not one of its explicit goals, the CDM is frequently perceived as a vehicle for inter-2 International technology transfer in CDM projects national technology transfer 1 (Dechezleprêtre, Glachant, & Ménière, 2008Murphy, Kirkman, Seres, & Haites, 2013;Popp, 2011;Schneider, Holzer, & Hoffmann, 2008;Weitzel, Liu, & Vaona, 2014). As part of the CDM approval process, host countries may require these projects to involve technology transfer (UNFCCC, 2010), but only few countries have done so explicitly (SpaldingFecher et al, 2012).…”
Section: " (United Nationsmentioning
confidence: 99%