Understanding the connection between SMEs’ competitiveness and cash flow generation: an empirical analysis from Hungary

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to interconnect the firm level competitive performance (competitiveness) to the financial performance of the firms. The goal is to give evidence on how successful small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) use their financial performance to support their competitive performance. Design/methodology/approach Competitiveness is interpreted and measured through the resource-based view theory on a wide range of competitiveness measurements with a sample size of 639 SMEs. Financial data originate from official, publicly accessible governmental archives. All data are from a mid-size Central European country (Hungary). To interconnect competitiveness and financial performance, this paper recognizes two types of cash flow, namely, cash flow to the “past” (dividend and debt service) and cash flow to the “future” (CAPEX and innovation). This paper used ordinary least squares regression and binomial logistic regression to analyze connections. Findings Cash flows to the “future” have much stronger effects on competitiveness than cash flows to the “past.” Debt services do not affect competitiveness, whereas dividends, CAPEX and innovation efforts have a significant positive connection to competitiveness, showing that higher cash flow indicates higher competitive performance. If this paper knows how much the firm spends on innovation and dividends, in about the four-fifths of the cases, this paper can predict the level of the competitiveness of the firm without any additional information. The level of these variables gives enough information, the variability of them is not relevant. Research limitations/implications The explanatory power of future-oriented cash flow elements is much higher than that of the past-oriented ones, while innovation dominates all models. Firms with higher competitiveness build their returns in their cost structure, and only when the financial position of the firm is stable enough, withdraw the financial resource based on a long-term plan. The results are limited by the fact that using the current sample, detailed and representative (e.g. cross-industrial, spatial, etc.) decomposition is not possible. Originality/value Literature is focusing on how SMEs reach success, how SMEs “earn money.” There is no evidence on how SMEs “spend money,” earned during their success.

Improving competitiveness in education institutes – ABC’s neglected potential

“…In the private sector, higher competitiveness is based on returns that are built on cost structures. When a company’s financial position is sufficiently stable, it can transfer resources to long-term strategies (Markus and Rideg, 2021). This study could compare educational institutes’ strategic decisions with cases of community social capital where managers are restrained from making opportunistic resource adjustment decisions and from acting unethically (Hartlieb et al , 2019).…”

An empirical examination on the links of cross-functional integration of production-marketing, BTO competitiveness and performance

“…Through empirical study, Karadag (2018) showed that FP is positively associated with competitiveness in small- and medium-sized companies in Turkey. Markus and Rideg (2021) argued that the direction of causality between competitiveness and FP is an open problem. Based on an empirical study sample from Hungary, they investigated the interconnection between the firm-level competitive performance (competitiveness) and the FP of the firms.…”

PERAN TATA KELOLA DAN SUMBER DAYA TERHADAP BEBAN R&D PERUSAHAAN NONKEUANGAN TERBUKA DI INDONESIA

“…Aset berwujud merupakan bentuk lain dari pengeluaran modal yang bisa menaikkan nilai perusahaan. Investasi pada aset berwujud dipercaya dapat meningkatkan kekayaan pemegang saham (Markus & Rideg, 2020). Adanya kebutuhan investasi dan sumber pendanaan terbatas sering kali membuat perusahaan memilih antara berinvestasi pada aset berwujud atau inovasi melalui kegiatan R&D. Namun, perusahaan juga bisa melakukan sinergi antara aset berwujud dengan R&D seperti pada teori RBV.…”