Understanding the evolution of environmental and energy performance of the US corn ethanol industry: evaluation of selected metrics

Abstract

Throughout the past two decades, numerous studies characterized the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and net energy balance of corn ethanol production in the USA. A wide range of reported values resulted from differences in the vintage of the data used to evaluate the ethanol conversion technology and the agricultural practices of corn production, which evolved substantially during the rapid growth phase of the industry. Methodological differences in life cycle assessments also caused the reported values to vary widely. With corn dry mills growing from 30% of total installed ethanol production capacity in 1990 to 80–90% from 2006 to 2011, we document the evolution of this industry using vintage‐specific data to analyze selected energy and environmental metrics, including GHG emissions, fossil energy use, direct land use, and GHG emissions reduction per hectare of land harvested for ethanol production. Our estimates indicate that production and use of corn ethanol emitted 44% fewer GHG emissions, consumed 54% less fossil energy and required 44% less land in 2010 compared to 1990 (on a life cycle basis). Our review and analysis point to strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of the corn dry mill industry by building on the progress already achieved. Using biomass (e.g. residues from corn production) for process heat or combined heat and power is one such strategy. Additional environmental benefits are projected from the adoption of integrated gasification combined cycle technology (using corn residues), which leads to energy‐self‐sufficient mills or net electricity producers depending on the power system configuration. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Factors affecting drivers' willingness to pay for biofuels: the case of Italy

“…Do biofuels work? This is the tormenting question that practitioners and scholars are constantly confronted with (Chum et al, 2014;Frank et al, 2013). The increasing relevance of the debate on biofuels and the contradictory evidence emerging from both media and academia spurred indeed great interest and curiosity within the public at large.…”

Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time

“…Recent studies have shown that corn ethanol's carbon benefit has increased to up to 50 % (Liska et al 2009;Wang et al 2011;Yang et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Chum et al 2013), compared with earlier estimates of 10-20 % (Farrell et al 2006;Hill et al 2006;Wang et al 2007). The productivity of the gasoline production system over the same period of time has been fairly steady (Wang 2013).…”

Influence of corn oil recovery on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol and corn oil biodiesel

“…The energy demand for the unit operations used in each process step was based on a USDA dry-mill ethanol plant process model built in Superpro [ 20 ]. Technology advancements, however, have decreased energy consumption at dry-mill corn ethanol plants [ 1 , 14 ] over time and the USDA process model is nearly a decade old. To address this issue, the energy demand for each unit operation was scaled based on corn ethanol plant energy consumption data [ 21 ] recently gathered in 2012.…”

“…In the past several years, corn oil recovery has been widely adopted in U.S. dry-mill corn ethanol plants, which produce around 90 % of U.S. corn ethanol [ 1 ]. Over 80 % of today’s dry-mill ethanol plants have adopted corn oil recovery [ 2 ].…”