2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the evolution of nutritive taste in animals: Insights from biological stoichiometry and nutritional geometry

Abstract: A major conceptual gap in taste biology is the lack of a general framework for understanding the evolution of different taste modalities among animal species. We turn to two complementary nutritional frameworks, biological stoichiometry theory and nutritional geometry, to develop hypotheses for the evolution of different taste modalities in animals. We describe how the attractive tastes of Na‐, Ca‐, P‐, N‐, and C‐containing compounds are consistent with principles of both frameworks based on their shared focus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in nature they are likely to use other cues, such as visual appearance, movement or position in the water column, it seems that visual cues are not necessary for diet choice evolution because our artificial food was identical in appearance. We hypothesize that our results could be driven by the evolution of taste, a mechanism proposed by Demi et al [31] to be a response to trophic level and stoichiometric demands. This does not rule out that other modes of food recognition can evolve at the same time and reinforce preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…While in nature they are likely to use other cues, such as visual appearance, movement or position in the water column, it seems that visual cues are not necessary for diet choice evolution because our artificial food was identical in appearance. We hypothesize that our results could be driven by the evolution of taste, a mechanism proposed by Demi et al [31] to be a response to trophic level and stoichiometric demands. This does not rule out that other modes of food recognition can evolve at the same time and reinforce preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The sense of taste allows the animals to assess the nutritive value of feed and therefore to select the feed according to their nutritional needs 53 . Sweet taste is one sign for edible feed and signals the presence of calories, even though sweetness does not necessarily reflect energy content 54 , 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS has a unique advantage in determining types and differences of diet, and stable isotope analysis can analyze the source and energy flow of diet, indicating different methods can complement with each other and have important insights for studying complex food webs [ 89 , 90 , 91 ]. Combined with NGS technology, nutrient geometry can be used to explore animals’ nutrient demand and foraging strategies, and investigate how animals respond to forage resources to achieve a specific ratio of two or more nutrients in the diet [ 4 ]. Integrated chemical and isotopic analysis of ceramic sherds from Pastoral Neolithic archaeological contexts in Kenya and Tanzania reveals a history reliance on milk, meat, and plant for ancient herding societies in eastern Africa [ 92 ], and the application of molecular diet analysis is useful to identify their precision feeding.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What an animal eats is perhaps the most ecologically important background information we can understand the species’ nutrition ecology [ 1 , 2 ], and diet analysis is one of the important contents of animal ecology [ 3 , 4 ]. It is the prerequisite for evaluating the host health, understanding the relationship between animal and environment, exploring predator-prey dynamics, uncovering trophic interactions, explaining behavioral plasticity and even faciliating pest management [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introduction To Diet Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%