Understanding the Experiences of Remote Workers: Opportunities for Ambient Workspaces at Home

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many to work remotely from home, collaborating solely through digital technologies, a growing population of remote home workers are faced with profound wellbeing challenges. Passive sensing devices and ambient feedback have great potential to support the wellbeing of the remote workers, but there is a lack of background and understanding of the domestic workplace in terms of physical and affective dimensions and challenges to wellbeing. There are profound research gaps on wellbeing in the domestic workplace, with the current push for remote home and hybrid working making this topic timely. To address these gaps and shape a starting point for an “ambient workspaces” agenda, we conducted an exploratory study to map physical and affective aspects of working from home. The study involved both qualitative and quantitative measures of occupant experience, including sensor wristbands, and a custom web application for self-reporting mood and aspects of the environment. It included 13 participants for a period of 4 weeks, during a period of exclusive home working. Based on quantitative and qualitative analysis, our study addresses wellbeing challenges of the domestic workplace, establishes correlations between mood and physical aspects, and discusses the impact of feedback mechanisms in the domestic workplace on the behavior of remote workers. Insights from these observations are then used to inform a future design agenda for ambient technologies that supports the wellbeing of remote workers; addressing the design opportunities for ambient interventions in domestic workspaces. This work offers three contributions: 1) qualitatively and quantitatively informed understandings of the experiences of home-workers; 2) a future design agenda for “ambient home workspaces”; and 3) we propose three design concepts for ambient feedback and human–AI interactions in the built environment, to illustrate the utility of the design agenda.

How physical home workspace characteristics affect mental health: A systematic scoping review

“…The onion distinguishes three layers, namely the time horizon layer, the method- First, the time horizon layer can be divided in longitudinal, prospective, and cross-sectional approaches. In four studies, a longitudinal approach was used, meaning that one pre-test and at least two post-tests were performed [15,[18][19][20]. The remaining 23 studies used a cross-sectional approach, in which observations were measured at only one point in time.…”

“…Three studies used a mixed method approach [15,21,22], in which quantitative data is complemented by qualitative data [21]. Only one study used a qualitative method, namely Montreuil and Lippel [14].…”

“…In 25 studies, a survey was used to obtain data. Four papers used interviews [14,15,21,22], and three papers used an experiment [15,18,19]. Margariti et al [15] asked participants to use a wearable band, which measured their physical activity and heart rate.…”

“…The average number of respondents that participated in the included studies was 903, with 13 being the lowest [15] and 6080 being the highest [16].…”

Hybrid Workplace: Activity–based office Design in a Post–pandemic Era

“…Alya and Lara are among the many who needed to quickly adjust to working from home (WFH) with the unprecedented COVID‐19 pandemic and the consequences of lockdowns. While WFH is not a new idea, the COVID‐19 pandemic accelerated this transition (Lal et al, 2021) and opened a new research area on the possible values of WFH (Margariti et al, 2021). Now, as organizations start calling employees back to the office, the discussions focus more on the impact of WFH practices on office culture, the dynamics of hybrid workplaces, and what these mean for the design of post‐pandemic office spaces.…”