2023
DOI: 10.31156/jaex.23878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Factors at Play in the Sender-Receiver Dynamic During the Telepathy Ganzfeld

Abstract: Objective. To use meta-analysis to explore five previously uninvestigated factors related to the sender-receiver dynamic in the telepathy ganzfeld. The five factors of interest are: a) did the receiver see the sender’s room prior to the session?; b) could the sender hear the receiver during the mentation period?; c) could the sender hear the receiver during the judging period?; d) was the sender explicitly told to be silent?; and e) did the experimenter assist in the review section of the session? Method: Tele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
To the Editor, I read with great interest the article "Understanding the factors at play in the sender-receiver dynamic during telepathy ganzfeld: A meta-analysis" (Pooley et al, 2023) in the latest issue of the Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition in which the authors disregarded Parra´s ganzfeld studies, remarking that: "serious fraudulent actions and widespread plagiarism conducted by Alejandro Parra […] we deemed it best to remove all the Parra studies from the dataset (a total of 5 data points). I am in agreement to discard studies containing plagiarism, however these ganzfeld studies are not affected by plagiarism or experimental fraud.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
To the Editor, I read with great interest the article "Understanding the factors at play in the sender-receiver dynamic during telepathy ganzfeld: A meta-analysis" (Pooley et al, 2023) in the latest issue of the Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition in which the authors disregarded Parra´s ganzfeld studies, remarking that: "serious fraudulent actions and widespread plagiarism conducted by Alejandro Parra […] we deemed it best to remove all the Parra studies from the dataset (a total of 5 data points). I am in agreement to discard studies containing plagiarism, however these ganzfeld studies are not affected by plagiarism or experimental fraud.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%