Understanding the Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on Practice-Based Population Health Management: A Mixed-Method Study

Abstract

BackgroundPractice-based population health (PBPH) management is the proactive management of patients by their primary care clinical team. The ability of clinics to engage in PBPH and the means by which they incorporate it in a clinical setting remain unknown.ObjectiveWe conducted the Canadian Population Health Management Challenge to determine the capacity and preparedness of primary care settings to engage in PBPH using their existing medical record systems and to understand the complexities that may exist in PBPH implementation.MethodsWe recruited a sample of electronic medical record (EMR) -enabled and paper-based clinics from across Canada to participate in the challenge. The challenge required clinic staff and physicians to complete time-controlled, evidence-based practice reviews of their patients who may benefit from evidence-informed care, treatment, or interventions across five different areas (immunization, postmyocardial infarction care, cancer screening, diabetes management, and medication recall). We formulated a preparedness index to measure the capacity of clinics to engage in PBPH management. Finally, we conducted follow-up qualitative interviews to provide richer understanding of PBPH implementation and related issues (ie, challenges and facilitators).ResultsA total of 11 primary care clinics participated, representing 21 clinician practices. EMR-enabled clinics completed a full review of charts in an average of 1.37 hours. On the contrary, paper-based clinics reviewed nearly 10% of their charts in an average of 3.9 hours, hinting that they would have required an estimated 40 hours to complete a review of charts in their practice. Furthermore, the index revealed a major gap in preparedness between the EMR and paper-based clinics (0.86–3.78 vs 0.05–0.12), as well as a broad range among the EMR clinics. Finally, building on the results of the qualitative analysis, we identified factors facilitating the integration of PBPH.ConclusionsOur results suggest that EMR usage is pivotal in setting the foundation to support PBPH. The wide range of performance variation among EMR-enabled clinics suggests that EMR functionality and optimization, its support of clinical practice workflow, and policy issues to ensure adoption of standards are critical issues to facilitate PBPH.

Population Health Management for Diabetes: Health Care System-Level Approaches for Improving Quality and Addressing Disparities

“…24,28,38,40,44 Our current review of the evidence suggests that population based approaches to diabetes care have significant potential for continuing to improve diabetes care and outcomes, and are well-aligned with current policy initiatives to increase both the accountability and patient-centeredness of the U.S. health care system. However, our review of the literature also found that there are a limited number of published evaluations of specific diabetes population care approaches, and those that are published may not have the level of programmatic detail required for dissemination into other settings.…”

“…27 Recent research suggests that when clinicians and practices use electronic health records, as opposed to traditional paper-based records, they enhance their ability to provide high-quality diabetes population care. 28–29 …”

Evaluating The Performance Of Malaysian Health Care Providers With Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

“…To clarify the results, informal interviews were conducted with six head of clinics (specialists) in the three surveyed hospitals. Following the method recommended by Vaghe et al [52], these heads were randomly selected based on their experience in using an EHR system. Discussion of the ndings thus begins with an overview of the results, followed by supports from real practices acquired from the interviews and prior literature.…”

Hindernisse bei der sekundären Nutzung hausärztlicher Routinedaten

“…Routinen aus ambulanter Betreuung und Versorgung haben genau dieses Potential. Erst kürzlich konnte eine amerikanische Arbeitsgruppe zeigen, wie die intelligente Nutzung primärärztlicher Routinedaten auch positiv die Gesundheitsversorgung auf Gemeindeebene beeinflussen kann [29]. Dafür muss jedoch in Deutschland die Nutzung solcher Daten technisch und organisatorisch wesentlich erleichtert werden.…”