2017
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x17000681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Impact of Visual Imagery in Emergency Warning Messages

Abstract: Study/Objective: Personal preparedness is a cardinal step to a better prepared community. For the purposes of personal preparedness planning mind maps can be strategically implemented in personal preparedness efforts to structure and synthesize key information. Background: Mind-mapping is a tool, which visually organizes information portraying complex hierarchies and relationships. As applied to personal-preparedness context, mind maps have potential for: 1) structuring existing information framework 2) convey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system architecture for the AFDRS is based on four modules: (i) a fuel state editor (an interactive tool for capture, upload and approval of the fuel inputs); (ii) fire danger calculations (implementation of the fire behaviour models and forecast calculations); (iii) a fire danger viewer Work has also been under way to develop and evaluate additional risk products that complement the Fire Behaviour Index in the form of indices for (Fire) Ignition, Suppression and Impacts (FISI Indices) (Jenkins et al 2021(Jenkins et al , 2022. Categories of Fire Danger Rating for the public-facing system were also developed to include lessons from research findings for improved communication of fire danger to the community (Tippett et al 2018), integration of findings from a recent nationwide survey (Metrix 2019) and consultation with stakeholders that make use of the fire danger rating system to inform decision-making. During implementation of the AFDRS, categories for the Operational Decision-making Framework were linked to the Public Facing Framework based on the Fire Behaviour Index to enable forecasting suitable for the general public.…”
Section: Overview Of the Australian Fire Danger Rating Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system architecture for the AFDRS is based on four modules: (i) a fuel state editor (an interactive tool for capture, upload and approval of the fuel inputs); (ii) fire danger calculations (implementation of the fire behaviour models and forecast calculations); (iii) a fire danger viewer Work has also been under way to develop and evaluate additional risk products that complement the Fire Behaviour Index in the form of indices for (Fire) Ignition, Suppression and Impacts (FISI Indices) (Jenkins et al 2021(Jenkins et al , 2022. Categories of Fire Danger Rating for the public-facing system were also developed to include lessons from research findings for improved communication of fire danger to the community (Tippett et al 2018), integration of findings from a recent nationwide survey (Metrix 2019) and consultation with stakeholders that make use of the fire danger rating system to inform decision-making. During implementation of the AFDRS, categories for the Operational Decision-making Framework were linked to the Public Facing Framework based on the Fire Behaviour Index to enable forecasting suitable for the general public.…”
Section: Overview Of the Australian Fire Danger Rating Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%