2021
DOI: 10.1002/anbr.202100098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Mechanobiology of Gliosis May Be the Key to Unlocking Sustained Chronic Performance of Bioelectronic Neural Interfaces

Abstract: In an effort to develop the next generation of neural implants, current research has focused on solving the challenges associated with the foreign body reaction and promoting long‐term device performance in vivo. Although the cutting edge of research in this field appears to be moving away from traditional metallic and semiconductor materials, the complex tissue dynamics which occur at the electrode–neural interface following device implantation are yet to be resolved. In particular, understanding the molecula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a number of studies have identified a significant role of the mechanical mismatch between stiff neural probes and the soft brain composition on reactive gliosis [24,25], leading to the development of softer or mechanically adaptive neural electrodes [26][27][28][29]. In particular, a growing body of evidence shows that relative micromotion at the probe/tissue interface arising from respiration, pulsatile blood flow and physical movement [30][31][32], is a significant mediator of glial scarring [33][34][35][36][37]. These mechanical actions expose the peri-electrode tissues to cyclic shear stresses [38][39][40][41][42][43][44],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a number of studies have identified a significant role of the mechanical mismatch between stiff neural probes and the soft brain composition on reactive gliosis [24,25], leading to the development of softer or mechanically adaptive neural electrodes [26][27][28][29]. In particular, a growing body of evidence shows that relative micromotion at the probe/tissue interface arising from respiration, pulsatile blood flow and physical movement [30][31][32], is a significant mediator of glial scarring [33][34][35][36][37]. These mechanical actions expose the peri-electrode tissues to cyclic shear stresses [38][39][40][41][42][43][44],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%