2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01355-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Molecular Epidemiology of the Footrot Pathogen Dichelobacter nodosus To Support Control and Eradication Programs

Abstract: Despite the high genetic diversity, three common clonal groups predominated in WA and were found in other Australian states. On some farms, molecular type was stable over a number of years, whereas on other farms genetically diverse isolates occurred within a flock of sheep or within a hoof. This study provides a large database from which to appropriately interpret molecular types found in epidemiological investigations and to identify common and unknown types that may compromise footrot eradication or control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Western Australia isolated from the feet of sheep at an abattoir (Buller et al, 2010 The complete pgr gene was amplified in 8 isolates ( primers. Fifty isolates were tested against each set of primers for the pgrA and pgrB genes.…”
Section: Isolates 72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Western Australia isolated from the feet of sheep at an abattoir (Buller et al, 2010 The complete pgr gene was amplified in 8 isolates ( primers. Fifty isolates were tested against each set of primers for the pgrA and pgrB genes.…”
Section: Isolates 72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic epidemiology has long been used to track and infer relatedness within and between species of bacteria. Various tools have been applied to D. nodosus ; RFLP (Ghimire and Egerton, 1999 ), infrequent restriction site PCR (Zakaria et al, 1998 ) and the traditional “Gold Standard” epidemiological tool PGFE (Buller et al, 2010 ), to try and understand the diversity and inform approaches to combat footrot. However, these often suffer with poor reproducibility between laboratories and are time consuming and expensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both are time consuming and require a large amount of input DNA and suffer from inter-lab biases. Infrequent restriction site PCR has also been implemented but was shown to be less robust than the RFLP (Buller et al, 2010 ). More recently Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis has proven to be a reproducible and high discriminatory method (Russell et al, 2014 ), however further analysis is limited due to VNTR only using PCR and gel electrophoresis visualization to draw conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dichelobacter nodosus , a Gram-negative, non-spore-forming obligate anaerobe, is the primary causative organism of footrot in ungulates (mammals with hooves, including cattle, sheep, deer, and goats) ( 1 ). The most well-known disease caused by D. nodosus is ovine footrot, a highly contagious necrotic disease of sheep hooves ( 2 ).…”
Section: Genome Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%