Understanding the psychosocial impact of oral cancer on the family caregivers and their coping up mechanism: A qualitative study in Rural Wardha, Central India

Abstract

Background:A family caregiver is the one who provides care to their near and dear one who is suffering from some debilitating disease like oral cancer. Apart from providing physical care, they also provide emotional and financial support to their close relatives. They can be the patient's spouse, children, and siblings. This study was, hence, designed to understand the psychosocial impact of caregivers of oral cancer patients.Methodology:This was a qualitative study using in-depth interviews of 24 purposively chosen family caregivers irrespective of age, sex, and relationship with patients, who provided deep insight into the psychosocial impact of the disease on themselves during caregiving of their loved ones and how they coped with it. Interviews were taken in Hindi, in the houses of caregivers. Care was taken to maintain utmost privacy while taking the interviews, which were either audio recorded or noted down. Informed written consent was obtained from participants before the start of the study. Themes were evolved from the interviews and content analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti.Results:Six themes emerged after data analysis. Those were the impact on physical health and lifestyle, emotional impact, impact on family and social relationship, impact on financial and work status, improvement of hospital services, spiritual concern, and acceptance of the disease. A concept map was made to provide a vivid explanation of how oral cancer caused these impacts on caregivers and their interrelationship.Conclusion:Caregiving is not an easy job. This study recommends extra care to be taken in preparing them for caregiving to the oral cancer patients with adequate knowledge of the disease process and its consequences along with counseling facilities in the hospital to address the different psychosocial needs of the patients.

<p>Short-Term Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Their Predictors in Tongue Cancer Patients After Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Prospective, Comparative Study</p>

“…In the present study, denture use (p = 0.007) and occupation (p = 0.001) were found to be factors predicting the quality of life in terms of swallowing symptoms before the surgery. These results are in accordance with those of Hahn et al 28 and Goswami et al, 29 respectively. Age (p = 0.017), tumor site (p = 0.033), and denture use (p = 0.000) were found to significantly predict the quality of life at one month after the surgery.…”

The Experiences of Oral Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

“…Impaired speech due to pain may also lead to changes in work and restriction of interpersonal relationships 84 . Inability to accomplish essential activities of daily living and having to rely on others may lead to psychological impact as patients feel lessened or limited by the condition 85 . Nevertheless, guided support by specialists has been shown to be helpful in enhancing patients' quality of life through development of positive coping strategies to deal with pain 41 .…”

Family Caregivers’ Experiences of Caring for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

“…The final construction of themes was determined by a reached consensus of authors. This data synthesis process preserves the 9 Dri et al (2020), 11 Halkett et al (2020), 13 Balfe et al (2017), 14 Balfe et al (2017), 15 Fronczek (2015), 17 Balfe et al (2016), 22 Badr et al (2016), 25 Balfe et al (2016), 34 Goswami, Gupta and Raut (2019), 35 Kitrungrote et al (2008), 36 Liang et al (2019), 37 Mayre-Chilton et al (2011), 38 Nund et al (2014), 39 Nund et al (2015), 40 Schaller et al (2014) 44 Minor 9 Dri et al (2020), 11 Halkett et al (2020), 13 Balfe et al (2017), 15 Fronczek (2015), 17 Balfe et al (2016), 22 Badr et al (2016), 25 Balfe et al (2016), 34 Goswami, Gupta and Raut (2019), 35 Kitrungrote et al (2008), 36 Liang et al (2019), 37 Mayre-Chilton et al (2011), 38 Nund et al (2014), 39 Nund et al (2015), 40 Penner et al (2012), 41 Röing et al (2008), 43 Schaller et al (2014), 44 Waliyanti and Primastuti (2021) 45 Minor…”