“…In the specific field of CLIL research, studies on strategies and strategic instruction are still limited (among recent papers, Castellano Risco, 2019; Macaro, 2018;Macaro et al, 2019;Menegale, 2018Menegale, , 2019aPsaltou-Joycey et al, 2014;Ruiz de Zarobe & Zenotz, 2018), "even though [they] are an integral part of the curricular elements that help students to learn" (Ruiz de Zarobe & Zenotz, 2015, p. 319). Reflecting on the characteristics of a CLIL curriculum, and informed by the taxonomies formerly proposed by other scholars in relation to bilingual programmes like CLIL (i.e., Chamot & O"Malley, 1994;Coonan, 2012;Macaro, 2018;Navés et al, 2002;Wolff, 2010), a copious strategy repertoire can be outlined which include, for example: strategies for reading comprehension (Ruiz de Zanobe & Zenotz, 2015;Macaro, 2018); strategies for preparing and structure writing (Papaja, 2014); communication strategies to overcome linguistic difficulties encountered when trying to communicate in a foreign language with a reduced interlanguage system (Garcí a Mayo & Lá zaro Ibarrola, 2015; Martí nez-Adriá n et al, 2019); vocabulary-related strategies, namely, inferring, networking, working with dictionaries (Castellano Risco, 2019;Eldridge et al, 2010;Macaro et al, 2019); strategies to favour learning transfer (cf. Menegale, 2019b).…”