2010
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daq002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the structure of community collaboration: the case of one Canadian health promotion network

Abstract: In 2004, over 6.8 million Canadians were considered overweight, with an additional 2.4 million labeled clinically obese. Due to these escalating levels of obesity in Canada, physical activity is being championed by politicians, physicians, educators and community members as a means to address this health crisis. In doing so, many organizations are being called upon to provide essential physical activity services and programs to combat rising obesity rates. Yet, strategies for achieving these organizations' man… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, policies on integrated care matter, as has been supported by findings in six European countries [47]. The sharing network of population health information in neither county has the greatest number of ties in four types of networks, which is not in accordance with previous research in developed countries [4849]. According to interviews with the heads of institutions and doctors, there are two reasons for the difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, policies on integrated care matter, as has been supported by findings in six European countries [47]. The sharing network of population health information in neither county has the greatest number of ties in four types of networks, which is not in accordance with previous research in developed countries [4849]. According to interviews with the heads of institutions and doctors, there are two reasons for the difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A high level of shared information is a good indicator of network potential because community capacity generally begins with it. [4950]. Therefore, further development of information sharing networks may bring more collaboration in health systems [51] by solidifying other types of integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, collaboration was assumed to be a reciprocated/ shared act between two parties; the relationships profiled in this network are consequently considered to be undirected. Although mapping a network based only on links confirmed by both collaborators (the organization surveyed and the partners it identifies) could be considered more reliable, including all links indicated by the participants can offer a better representation of the extent of the collaboration network by including potentially weaker but nevertheless existent collaborations between organizations (Barnes et al 2010; Harris 2013; Provan et al 2005). It is also common to treat professional collaborative ties as reciprocated.…”
Section: Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNA has been used to study a wide range of health-related topics (for an overview of the field, see Chambers et al 2012; Smith and Christakis 2008; Valente 2010), and there is growing interest in developing research on the structure of public health systems with the support of SNA (Barnes et al 2010; Harris et al 2008; Leider et al 2015; Luke and Harris 2007; Varda and Retrum 2012). Our study contributes to this trend by providing a first map of the Canadian CDP collaborative structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A social network analysis (SNA) approach, which offers a quantitative understanding of networks as a configuration of nodes linked together by means of relations, was used to identify the actors and their connections in each of the four networks [see Barnes et al (2010) for the use of similar categories of roles explored in a social network analysis of a Canadian health care network]. Organisations noted by interviewees and their interrelations were coded for each of these relations using Atlas.ti qualitative data analysis software, and imported into the Ucinet 6 (Borgatti et al, 2002) social network analysis program.…”
Section: Describing and Evaluating The Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%