2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipcc.2015.7235824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the value proposition as a co-created claim

Abstract: -In this paper, we examine five cases of technology commercialization in terms of how entrepreneurs advance a specific kind of claim: the value proposition. The value proposition can describe the characteristics of the innovation itself (GoodsDominant Logic) or propose how the innovation will cocreate value with stakeholders (Service-Dominant Logic); in the examined cases, the value proposition transitions between these two "logics," addressing different needs in the ongoing argument. We conclude by discussing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the research did not capture training and other informal interactions among entrepreneurs and GCG personnel. We address some of these factors in later studies (Spinuzzi et al [79]; London et al [45]; Jakobs et al [36]). …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the research did not capture training and other informal interactions among entrepreneurs and GCG personnel. We address some of these factors in later studies (Spinuzzi et al [79]; London et al [45]; Jakobs et al [36]). …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For more on this pitch competition, see Spinuzzi et al [79]; Spinuzzi et al [78]; London et al [45]; Jakobs et al [36]. For more on similar pitch competitions, see Gibson & Conceiçao [29]; Park et al [57]; Sung & Gibson [78].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) Consequently, these entrepreneurs often developed arguments that fit within Korea's cultural and economic context but not the U.S. market. Thus firms had to shift from descriptive arguments to proposal arguments (London, Pogue, & Spinuzzi, 2015) that compellingly expressed a value proposition for a specific audience, presented evidence for that value proposition, and described an effective team. …”
Section: Research Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, suppliers focus their efforts on what matters to their customers' contextual narrative (e.g. services, solutions), rather than on their own product-based narrative (London et al, 2015;Chandler and Vargo, 2011). As such, narratives may cross boundaries between traditional roles of designers and users (Orlikowski and Robey, 1991), and entangle stakeholders with different roles in complex ecosystems (Reypens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Operationalizing Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%