Proceedings of the 2nd Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2014
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2014-1922870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Tortuosity and Permeability variations in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Niobrara Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it must be mentioned that artificial "fractures" in lab-scale core sample are ideal due to the lack of roughness, tortuosity, and aperture variation. In fractured porous media, fractures will be more heterogeneous, and should these are taken into account (see for example the works by Tokan-Lawal et al, 2014;Laubach et al, 2010;and Becker et al, 2010) achieved permeability values after gel placement could be smaller compared to the ones reported in Tables 6 and 7. However, field applications pose several inherent challenges related to, among others, full wellbore control, fluids placement issues, unknown reservoir heterogeneities, three dimensional fluid flow, temperature variations in the direction away from the injection well, variations of ions type and concentration, fluids mixing especially at the front of the placed chemical system.…”
Section: Summary Of Core Scale Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it must be mentioned that artificial "fractures" in lab-scale core sample are ideal due to the lack of roughness, tortuosity, and aperture variation. In fractured porous media, fractures will be more heterogeneous, and should these are taken into account (see for example the works by Tokan-Lawal et al, 2014;Laubach et al, 2010;and Becker et al, 2010) achieved permeability values after gel placement could be smaller compared to the ones reported in Tables 6 and 7. However, field applications pose several inherent challenges related to, among others, full wellbore control, fluids placement issues, unknown reservoir heterogeneities, three dimensional fluid flow, temperature variations in the direction away from the injection well, variations of ions type and concentration, fluids mixing especially at the front of the placed chemical system.…”
Section: Summary Of Core Scale Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An average density range was calculated for each hydrogeological unit according to the rock types identified in the borehole cuttings. The third of these parameters was the tortuosity (α), defined as a ratio of fluid flow in a porous media (Pisani, 2011;Tokan-Lawal et al, 2014). For this study, the value of α was fixed at 1.4 (Urish, 1981;Aguilera, 2008;Piedrahita and Aguilera, 2017) for all the hydrogeological units due to its low impact in zones with low porosity, a primary characteristic of this catchment.…”
Section: Claymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of these empirical correlations is that the coefficients are empirical and vary with rock type. Tokan-Lawal et al (2014) captured the fracture geometry with x-ray microtomograpgy (CT) scan and determined the permeability and tortuosity of the fracture by cubic law equation (Eq. 4 in the following section).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%