2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Uncertainty Maps in Vision with Statistical Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the MSE for interpolation and extrapolation were 0.0082 and 0.1545 respectively. In comparison NODE Nazarovs et al [2021] is 0.0074 and 0.1661 Takeaway. Clearly, we can see that by introducing IGO in the model, we get a good generation ability even for extrapolation in the future time steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the MSE for interpolation and extrapolation were 0.0082 and 0.1545 respectively. In comparison NODE Nazarovs et al [2021] is 0.0074 and 0.1661 Takeaway. Clearly, we can see that by introducing IGO in the model, we get a good generation ability even for extrapolation in the future time steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One of the applications of our proposed Intermediate Generator Optimization is modeling the trajectory of a Differential Equation, which describes the dynamic process. We use the setup in Nazarovs et al [2021], that is, we consider that dynamic process is modeled by changes in the latent space z as ż(t) = D(z, t)w, where D(z, t) is a neural network and w is a corresponding mixed effect (random projection describing flexibility (stochasticity) of dynamics). We propose to extend D(z, t) with our IGO, as D(z t , z τ ) using a neural network f , see Figure 4 -(a) for details on loss computation with z τ .…”
Section: Setup Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addressing this limitation is planned for future work, and different methods can be used to consider patient specific parameters in a ML framework. [30][31][32] Another limitation, is that due to the lack of publicly available data, we could only use in silico data in this study. Moreover, the performance comparison must be considered with the fact in mind that the PK-SciML framework used the known true structure, which enabled the superior performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%