“…These include attempts to derive beneficial effects from bubble acoustics, in fields as diverse as: climate science for air/sea transfer (Thorpe, 1992 ; the processing and monitoring of pharmaceuticals and food (Campbell, Mougeot, 1999;Skumiel et al, 2013), and of fuel and coolant (Leighton et al, 2012a); the generation of microfluidic devices (Carugo et al, 2011); ultrasonic cleaning (Leighton et al, 2005;Offin et al, 2014); and, in biomedicine, the provision of acoustic contrast agents and drug delivery vectors (Ferrara et al, 2007), and the use of cavitation as a therapy monitor (McLaughlan et al, 2010;Leighton et al, 2008a). Studies also include attempts to mitigate or exploit the detrimental effects of bubbles, for example in the cavitation erosion of turbines and propellers Szantyr, Koronowicz, 2006), ship noise and its environmental impact (Kozaczka, Grelowska, 2004;Parks et al, 2007;Grelowska et al, 2013), and the sonar clutter that oceanic bubbles can produce. With improvements in computing resources, and increases in the power of sonar sources and the bandwidth of receivers (Kozaczka, Grelowska, 1999;Ainslie, 2010), it became clear that the bubbles can readily be driven to produce nonlinear effects (Leighton et al, 1997;2004a;Lauterborn et al, 2008; Baranowska, 2012), although the models used in sonar studies to describe such scattering were predominantly linear and steady state (Clarke, Leighton, 2000; Ainslie, .…”