Oceans'11 MTS/Ieee Kona 2011
DOI: 10.23919/oceans.2011.6107283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater noise measurements of a 1/7th scale wave energy converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic impacts on marine habitat resulting from the installation and operation of the OTF should be minimized and can only be assessed from comparative studies using baseline ambient noise measurements. Recordings from a 1/7 scale wave energy conversion buoy in Puget Sound indicate the largest acoustic contribution to ambient levels from this type of device occurs in frequencies below 1 kHz (Bassett et al, 2011). This study provides an initial baseline description of long-term ambient noise levels and sound sources in the 10-840 Hz frequency range that can be utilized for future comparisons with ocean testing of wave energy conversion devices at NNMREC's OTF near Newport, OR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The acoustic impacts on marine habitat resulting from the installation and operation of the OTF should be minimized and can only be assessed from comparative studies using baseline ambient noise measurements. Recordings from a 1/7 scale wave energy conversion buoy in Puget Sound indicate the largest acoustic contribution to ambient levels from this type of device occurs in frequencies below 1 kHz (Bassett et al, 2011). This study provides an initial baseline description of long-term ambient noise levels and sound sources in the 10-840 Hz frequency range that can be utilized for future comparisons with ocean testing of wave energy conversion devices at NNMREC's OTF near Newport, OR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The SeaRay WEC induced increases in spectral levels consistent with the torque and shaft speeds in the fore generator [30]. These cases provide evidence that WEC engineering processes are detectable, even when data collection efforts are not specifically geared toward their detection.…”
Section: Underwater Acoustic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The inability to distinguish WEC sound levels from background noise -and hence nonoperational and operational modes-has been noted by a number of other studies [19,45]. The 1/7 th scale SeaRay WEC was unable to estimate the source level of the device due to local shipping [46]. This could be subject to change when arrays of devices are deployed, as the noise from multiple devices in an array would combine, as discussed by Tougaard in [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In half of the studies of WECs, a link is drawn between the acoustics produced and converter operation (e.g. [44][45][46]). Lepper and Robinson found a number of "events" related to the acoustic emissions of the Pelamis device (rattles, bangs, clanking etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%