Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3078081.3078106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unearthing the Recent Past

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with results achieved in ICDAR's historical newspaper layout analysis competition, where best systems achieve accuracy of 83-86% [1][2]. Same range of performance is achieved also in ICDAR 2015 and ICDAR 2017 where documents with complex layout were analyzed [3,7].…”
Section: Selection Of the Article Extraction Toolsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with results achieved in ICDAR's historical newspaper layout analysis competition, where best systems achieve accuracy of 83-86% [1][2]. Same range of performance is achieved also in ICDAR 2015 and ICDAR 2017 where documents with complex layout were analyzed [3,7].…”
Section: Selection Of the Article Extraction Toolsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Article extraction on complex layout digitized newspaper pages is not an easy task. Results of the biannual ICDAR competition on historical newspaper layout analysis show that current algorithms segment and label about 80-85 % of the pages correctly at best [1][2][3]7]. These results, however, are achieved with a smallish evaluation corpus of less than 100 documents [8] and the results are thus only indicative.…”
Section: Selection Of the Article Extraction Toolmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The digitisation project for the 1961 Census for England and Wales [1] [12] was conducted by the authors for the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) [13]. The goal was to produce a complete integrated digital dataset for publication by ONS, containing as much information as could possibly be extracted and validated from a set of approximately 140,000 digital images of computer printouts (via microfilm) of tables from the unpublished and almost entirely inaccessible 1961 Census Small Area Statistics.…”
Section: The 1961 Census Digitisation Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%