2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment and voter turnout revisited: A brief note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical support for the two hypotheses, however, is mixed. Studies that focus on the effects of individual unemployment typically point in the direction of the withdrawal hypothesis (Gallego, 2007;Emmenegger et al, 2015;Kern et al, 2015); however, those which study the relationship between overall unemployment and aggregate participation rates more often find support for the mobilization hypothesis (Lim and Sander, 2013;Burden and Wichowsky, 2014;Cebula, 2017).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical support for the two hypotheses, however, is mixed. Studies that focus on the effects of individual unemployment typically point in the direction of the withdrawal hypothesis (Gallego, 2007;Emmenegger et al, 2015;Kern et al, 2015); however, those which study the relationship between overall unemployment and aggregate participation rates more often find support for the mobilization hypothesis (Lim and Sander, 2013;Burden and Wichowsky, 2014;Cebula, 2017).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, most previous research on how contextual unemployment conditions the effect of individual unemployment uses American or European data in which contextual unemployment is measured at the state or country level (e.g. Kern et al, 2015;Cebula, 2017;Aytac¸et al, 2018;Kurer et al, 2019;Incantalupo, 2015). However, such aggregate measures are rather crude indicators of the contextual unemployment experienced by voters, since economic conditions typically vary considerably within states and countries with millions of residents.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals facing foreclosure are less likely to vote (Shah and Wichowsky 2019). However, other studies, particularly analyses of state-level unemployment data, find that unemployment is related to increased turnout and participation (Burden and Wichowsky 2014; Cebula 2017). Some work suggests that economic shocks demobilize through a mechanism of reduced trust, whereas other findings propose a linkage between blame attribution and behavior (Levin, Sinclair, and Alvarez 2016).…”
Section: Negative Economic Shocks and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…At the aggregate level, unemployment has proven to be a good indicator of the social condition of the respective unit of analysis (Schäfer, 2015; Schwarz, 2012). A high unemployment rate affects the working citizens in the district and depresses their willingness to vote through social interdependence, and fosters an atmosphere of rejection of the political system (Cebula, 2017). Accordingly, we will use unemployment as a proxy for the latent variable ‘socioeconomic background’ of city districts.…”
Section: Research Design: Voter Turnout In City Districts Across Europementioning
confidence: 99%