1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0896(96)00174-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected carbohydrate cross-binding by Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. Recognition of human and rabbit target cell glycoconjugates in comparison with cholera toxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For clarity, the contribution of the Asn 4 C ␤ H 2 group to the van der Waals surface was omitted but makes the side chain fit even tighter. not bind to human small intestinal glycoproteins on blotting membranes, and hLTB binds only after de-sialylation (38), indicating that certain substitutions on the Gal␤4GlcNAc␤6 (Gal␤3GlcNAc␤3)Gal␤ core obliterates the binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clarity, the contribution of the Asn 4 C ␤ H 2 group to the van der Waals surface was omitted but makes the side chain fit even tighter. not bind to human small intestinal glycoproteins on blotting membranes, and hLTB binds only after de-sialylation (38), indicating that certain substitutions on the Gal␤4GlcNAc␤6 (Gal␤3GlcNAc␤3)Gal␤ core obliterates the binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…membranes may be similar or identical. The delipidized membrane preparation contains LT receptors of glycoprotein nature (Holmgren et al, 1982) and could also include non-extractable hydrophilic glycolipids, such as PGCs (Karlsson et al, 1996). In contrast, the LTB residues Asn-94 and Ser-95 had no detectable effect on the binding to the acid GSL preparation containing both GM1 and non-GM1 gangliosides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CT and LT bind with high affinity to ganglioside GM1, Gal␤3GalNac␤4(NeuAc␣3)Gal␤4Glc␤1Cer (Holmgren et al, 1973;1975). In addition, LT also binds significantly to glycoprotein receptors present in the intestines of several species (Griffiths and Critchley, 1991;Holmgren et al, 1982;Shida et al, 1996), to polyglycosylceramides (PGCs), complex glycolipids with carbohydrate chains of more than 30 saccharides (Karlsson et al, 1996), and with low affinity to other glycosphingolipids including GM2, asialo-GM1 and neolactotetraosylceramide (paragloboside) (Fukuta et al, 1988;Teneberg et al, 1994). These non-GM1 receptors have been estimated to account for Ϸ50% or as much as 90% of the total binding activity of LT in human or rabbit intestine, respectively (Holmgren et al, 1982;, and, at least in the rabbit, they are of functional significance, since CTB could not inhibit the fluid secretion induced by LT (Holmgren et al, 1982;Pierce, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neolactotetraose (NEO) is a secondary receptor present on the surface of small intestinal epithelial cells (Karlsson et al 1996) that may be competing with GM1, the primary receptor of LTB. The crystal structure of NEO in complex with LTB from porcine isolates (pLTB) shows that NEO binds in the primary binding site of the toxin (Holmner et al 2011).…”
Section: Assignment and Data Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%