Unidade De Conservação Na Amazônia E Territorialidades Específicas: O Caso Da Reserva Extrativista De Ipaú-Anilzinho

Brito, Stephanie Vieira; Treccani, Girolamo Domenico

doi:10.26668/indexlawjournals/2525-9687/2019.v5i2.5995

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, the State faces difficulties in promoting the conservation of natural resources, the quality of life of inhabitants, the resolution of illegal actions (deforestation, burning), and conflicts in the territory due to lack of socioenvironmental integration projects (Goeschl & Igliori, 2004;Brito & Treccani, 2019;Paiva et al, 2020). The main causes of the problems mentioned are associated with low investments in human, financial capital, devaluation of local participation (Haddad et al, 2019;Vivacqua & Vieira, 2005;Prost, 2018), subsistence difficulties (Maciel et al, 2010), economic crisis of extractive products (Silva & Paraense, 2019), and livestock growth (Loyola, 2014).…”

Section: Resexsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socio-environmental success or failure of Extractive Reserves in the Amazon?

Freitas

Mathis

Caldas

et al. 2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brazilian public institutions have difficulties in building relationships of trust that truly promote sustainable development. This study proves that the Extractive Reserves (RESEX) socio-environmental crisis occurs due to the interdependent relationship that exists between environmental, economic, social groups and institutional organizations. The study concludes that the implementation of public policies regarding health, education, transportation, communication, technical assistance, energy, as well as the current revenues from the productive activities of extractivism, agriculture, and cattle ranching was ineffective, because the state did not cooperate with strategies to alleviate the conflict between conservation and development.

show abstract