2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified Simulations of Planetary Formation and Atmospheric Evolution: Effects of Pebble Accretion, Giant Impacts, and Stellar Irradiation on Super-Earth Formation

Abstract: A substantial number of super-Earths have been discovered, and atmospheres of transiting super-Earths have also been observed by transmission spectroscopy. Several lines of observational evidence indicate that most super-Earths do not possess massive H 2 /He atmospheres. However, accretion and retention of less massive atmospheres on super-Earths challenge planet formation theory. We consider the following three mechanisms: (i) envelope heating by pebble accretion, (ii) mass loss during giant impacts, and (iii… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giant collisions, which may be important at the time of disc dispersal (Ogihara & Hori 2020), are, in addition to photoevaporation, a possible mechanism that could help in removing a planet's atmosphere. Although we did not consider collisions in our simulations since we formed only one planet per simulation, we can estimate in a simple way the fraction of envelope mass-loss a planet could undergo if we allowed it to collide with another lessmassive planet, formed isolated in the same disc.…”
Section: Appendix D: Envelope Mass-loss By Giant Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Giant collisions, which may be important at the time of disc dispersal (Ogihara & Hori 2020), are, in addition to photoevaporation, a possible mechanism that could help in removing a planet's atmosphere. Although we did not consider collisions in our simulations since we formed only one planet per simulation, we can estimate in a simple way the fraction of envelope mass-loss a planet could undergo if we allowed it to collide with another lessmassive planet, formed isolated in the same disc.…”
Section: Appendix D: Envelope Mass-loss By Giant Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity and following the results of Ogihara & Hori (2020), who report only one or two giant impacts when accounting for N-body interactions, we allow only one collision per planet, but compute all the possible results of that collision considering that all the less-massive planets in the same disc (with final periods <100 days), can be the impactor. We compute mean values for the core mass, envelope mass, and core ice fraction for each 'family of impacts'.…”
Section: Appendix D: Envelope Mass-loss By Giant Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the basic success of the core-accretion model in explaining that low-mass planets can acquire a H/He envelope, it has failed to quantitatively explain the properties of observed sub-Neptunes (e.g. Lee et al 2014;Ogihara & Hori 2020;Alessi et al 2020). In fact the issue is not that they have accreted H/He atmospheres, it is that they have only accreted a few percent by mass, even after massloss processes like photoevaporation (Jankovic et al 2019;Ogihara & Hori 2020) and/or core-powered mass-loss (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owen and Wu 2017;Kubyshkina et al 2019a;Rogers and Owen 2020). However, the quantitative details are still uncertain, with most planet formation models over-predicting the amount of H/He a planet can accrete (Jankovic et al 2019;Ogihara and Hori 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%