2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform honeycomb CNT-microparticles prepared via droplet-microfluidics and sacrificial nanoparticles for electrochemical determination of methyl parathion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Fig. S4† shows, with the pH value increasing, the anodic peak shifted to the negative potential, which agreed with the previous publications, 11,41 indicating that the deprotonation may have facilitated electron transfer with lower peak potential. What is more, a linear relationship between the peak potential and the pH value was observed with a regression equation of E pc (mV) = −58.96 pH − 115.88 ( R 2 = 0.998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Fig. S4† shows, with the pH value increasing, the anodic peak shifted to the negative potential, which agreed with the previous publications, 11,41 indicating that the deprotonation may have facilitated electron transfer with lower peak potential. What is more, a linear relationship between the peak potential and the pH value was observed with a regression equation of E pc (mV) = −58.96 pH − 115.88 ( R 2 = 0.998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, the electroactive surface areas (ECSA) of the modified electrodes were calculated using the Randles–Sevcik equation: 41 I p = 2.69 × 10 5 × A × n 3/2 × c × D 1/2 × v 1/2 where I p (A) is the anodic current peak, A (cm 2 ) is the active surface area, n is the number of electrons transferred in the electrochemical reaction, c (mol cm −3 ) is the concentration of the electroactive species, v (V s −1 ) is the scan rate and D is the diffusion coefficient ( D = 7.6 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 for [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3−/4− ). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hitherto, many analytical methods including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, high-performance liquid chromatography, and electrochemical methods , have been established to detect OPs. However, it is regrettable that these methods are somewhat insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since stable dispersions of CNTs have a limited concentration range in most solvents, even if surface functionalization or surfactants are used to improve solubility (for instance, oxidised multiwalled CNTs (oxMWNTs) in water start to gel around 0.5 vol% [33] ), the solidification of a compact secondary microparticle from a dilute droplet tem plate is challenging. The most common method of forming solid microparticles with a high CNT content and homoge neous internal structure is through the gradual evaporation of the droplet phase solvent from waterinoil (W/O) emulsion templates, [16,18,21] although the extraction of water into the con tinuous phase solvent [9] has also been explored. While evapora tion clearly takes place at an airemulsion interface, the exact mechanism by which water is transported out of droplet tem plates and to this interface is often not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%