The adaptive potential of a population defines its importance for species survival in changing environmental conditions such as global climate change. Very few empirical studies have examined adaptive potential across species' ranges, namely, of edge vs core populations, and we are unaware of a study that has tested adaptive potential (namely, variation in adaptive traits) and measured performance of such populations in conditions not currently experienced by the species but expected in the future. Here we report the results of a Triticum dicoccoides population study that employed transplant experiments and analysis of quantitative trait variation. Two populations at the opposite edges of the species range (1) were locally adapted; (2) had lower adaptive potential (inferred from the extent of genetic quantitative trait variation) than the two core populations; and (3) were outperformed by the plants from the core population in the novel environment. The fact that plants from the species arid edge performed worse than plants from the more mesic core in extreme drought conditions beyond the present climatic envelope of the species implies that usage of peripheral populations for conservation purposes must be based on intensive sampling of among-population variation. Heredity (2014) 113, 268-276; doi:10.1038/hdy.2014; published online 2 April 2014
INTRODUCTION
Plant performance and adaptive potential across species rangeThe 'abundant center' model (Sagarin and Gaines, 2002) predicts a decrease in population size toward the species distributional periphery that implies that evolutionarily stable limits of species geographic distributions are shaped by two genetic parameters, effective population size and the amount of gene flow, and that these two parameters are higher at the range center and lower at range margins. According to this concept, species do not expand beyond range edges and plants fail to adapt to local conditions there because of lower genetic diversity and higher genetic differentiation in geographically peripheral as compared with core populations and therefore limited availability of locally beneficial alleles in these populations (Mayr, 1963;Hoffmann and Blows, 1994; Hoffmann and Parsons, 1997;Lennon et al., 1997; Keitt, 2000, 2005;Blows and Hoffmann, 2005;Alleaume-Benharira et al., 2006).The 'abundant center' model also has implications for a question of how population position within a species range affects its evolutionary potential, namely, its ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. If peripheral populations have lower genetic variation in potentially adaptive traits than populations at the species core because of strong genetic drift, as predicted by the 'abundant center' model, then their potential for evolutionary adaptation to future changes will be low. On the other hand, if peripheral populations maintain substantial genetic variation in traits conferring adaptation to the specific range conditions, then their evolutionary potential and hence conservation value will be hig...