2014
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unimodal regression using Bernstein–Schoenberg splines and penalties

Abstract: Research in the field of nonparametric shape constrained regression has been intensive. However, only few publications explicitly deal with unimodality although there is need for such methods in applications, for example, in dose-response analysis. In this article, we propose unimodal spline regression methods that make use of Bernstein-Schoenberg splines and their shape preservation property. To achieve unimodal and smooth solutions we use penalized splines, and extend the penalized spline approach toward pen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For classes of unimodal functions indexed by a smoothness parameter, the authors prove rates of convergence of the mode of the LSE and also show that the rates are minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors, for a given smoothness class. Köllmann et al (2014) propose the use of a penalized estimator based on splines to estimate the underlying unimodal function, but without studying the risk properties of their estimator. Hence, apparently little is known about the behavior of the LSE θ as an estimator of θ * .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For classes of unimodal functions indexed by a smoothness parameter, the authors prove rates of convergence of the mode of the LSE and also show that the rates are minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors, for a given smoothness class. Köllmann et al (2014) propose the use of a penalized estimator based on splines to estimate the underlying unimodal function, but without studying the risk properties of their estimator. Hence, apparently little is known about the behavior of the LSE θ as an estimator of θ * .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the Q-functions at t = 1, 2 we use Random Forests [30] and to estimate the Q-function at baseline we use L 2 -penalized unimodal regression with Bernstein-Schoenberg Splines [31] with the amount of penalization chosen by cross-validated mean squared error. At baseline the state S 0 is a vector composed of unity, age, weight ( blweight ), baseline pain score ( Y 0 ), and the baseline safety event indicator ( Z 0 ).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function estimator tends to have a "spike" at the largest observation near the true mode, and hence the mode estimator tends to have a larger variance than that for a smoothed function estimator. The convergence rate ofm satisfies that lim n→∞ sup{n/(log(n)) 2γ } 1/(2s+1) |m − m| < ∞ a.s.. Köllmann, Bornkamp, and Ickstadt (2014) discuss penalized spline methods to achieve unimodal and smooth estimation of a functional relationship in a scenario of dose-response analysis. They use a restricted maximum likelihood approach to choose the tuning parameter and to estimate B-spline coefficients.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unimodal Case. We compare our estimatorm S with the estimatorm P of Shoung and Zhang (2001) and the estimatorm U of Köllmann et al (2014). We choose two unimodal functions.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%