1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02572333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unimodular lattices over real quadratic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further A and D stand for the root lattices of the corresponding type. The four one-class genera of unimodular lattices over totally real quadratic fields have been found by Scharlau in [Sch94]. In this paper, he gives explicit constructions for these lattices and the corresponding automorphism groups Aut(H 4 ) = (SL 2 (5) • SL 2 (5)) : 2 in the notation of [NP95], Aut(D 4 ( √ 2)) = Aut(D 4 ).2, Aut(D ∼ 4 ) and Aut((2A 2 ) ∼ ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Further A and D stand for the root lattices of the corresponding type. The four one-class genera of unimodular lattices over totally real quadratic fields have been found by Scharlau in [Sch94]. In this paper, he gives explicit constructions for these lattices and the corresponding automorphism groups Aut(H 4 ) = (SL 2 (5) • SL 2 (5)) : 2 in the notation of [NP95], Aut(D 4 ( √ 2)) = Aut(D 4 ).2, Aut(D ∼ 4 ) and Aut((2A 2 ) ∼ ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, extending A 4 and A * 4 to lattices over Z[τ ], compare [19], one sees that I is intermediate between them, but is still integral for tr(xȳ). When viewed as a Z[τ ]-module, I has class number 1, see [19,Thm. 3.4].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An alternative way to prove Proposition 1 would be to use Remark 2 and to show that all potential x ∈ I with x = x are elements of the dual of L (taken with respect to tr(xȳ)), but that the coset representative of A * 4 /A 4 cannot be chosen in I. In fact, extending A 4 and A * 4 to lattices over Z[τ ], compare [19], one sees that I is intermediate between them, but is still integral for tr(xȳ). When viewed as a Z[τ ]-module, I has class number 1, see [19,Thm.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40, §16.6, pp133-134], [35, §5.16, pp33-34]) or small class number, however almost all actual computational results have been limited to either the case F = Q or to unimodular lattices over real quadratic fields. When [F : Q] > 1, the author is only aware of the papers [11,22,21,23,31].…”
Section: Neighbors and Generamentioning
confidence: 99%