Unions in Digital Labour Studies: A Review of Information Society and Marxist Autonomist Approaches

Abstract

A developing research agenda in digital labour studies draws on aspects of information society theory and Marxist autonomism to understand examples of unionisation in digital workplaces and among digital labourers. In this article, I trace core concepts of information society theory and autonomism to demonstrate how unions have been framed by prominent figures in the field. I argue that both approaches tend to relegate unions to industrial capitalism and its historically-specific set of class relations. Information society theorists argue that capitalist class conflict has been transcended, perceiving unions as an obstacle to flexibility and entrepreneurship. Autonomists maintain a focus on class conflict, yet, based on their analysis of contemporary class composition, tend to prioritise other forms of organisation over unions. Digital labour studies research has developed, in part, as a critique of information society theory and draws on aspects of autonomism, including the concepts of precarity and immaterial labour. Authors studying empirical examples of unionisation among digital labourers identify different challenges and opportunities for unionisation among digital labours, and demonstrate the utility of unions for improving the conditions of digital labourers and promoting new working-class subjectivities.

New technology, trade unions and the future: not quite the end of organised labour

“…There are interventions that see a tension between more formal and institutionalised trade union approaches and structures, on the one hand, and those emerging 'on the ground' within the gig economy with its more direct and explicit forms of exploitation and marginalisation, on the other. However, there are more complex dynamics at play as each of these constituencies of worker organisations have various internal dynamics that suggest a greater degree of interaction (Neilson, 2018;Smith, 2021). The ways that new organisations of worker voice are evolving -and perhaps jostling with each other -within these new fragmented spaces of the gig economy is an increasing focus of research as the experiences of gig-related workers are fore-fronted in a range of debates regarding the innovative aspects of such movements as well as the problems of sustainability (Wood and Lehdonvirta, 2019;Aloisi, 2019).…”

Collective Action in the Digital Reality: the Case of Platform‐Based Workers

“…94 This is indeed a meaningful obstacle to the creation of collective action. 95 Trade unions are traditionally based on a solid collective identity and strong solidarity among colleagues. 96 This is especially important for gaining majority support in a ballot.…”

Dewesternizing Precarity in Turkish TV Drama Production through the Body and the Law

“…Yet, above the line workers also suffer from dangerous working conditions. Moreover, that CTU and PU collaborate reveals how precarity yields collective struggles around shared goals (Coles, 2016; de Peuter & Cohen, 2015; Neilson, 2018; Salamon, 2016).…”