2005
DOI: 10.1051/cocv:2005015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unique continuation and decay for the Korteweg-de Vries equation with localized damping

Abstract: Abstract. This work is devoted to prove the exponential decay for the energy of solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation in a bounded interval with a localized damping term. Following the method in Menzala (2002) which combines energy estimates, multipliers and compactness arguments the problem is reduced to prove the unique continuation of weak solutions. In Menzala (2002) the case where solutions vanish on a neighborhood of both extremes of the bounded interval where equation holds was solved combining th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linares and Pazoto [12] studied the stabilization of the generalized KdV system with critical exponents. Unique continuation and decay for the Korteweg-De Vries equation with localized damping have been studied by Pazoto [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linares and Pazoto [12] studied the stabilization of the generalized KdV system with critical exponents. Unique continuation and decay for the Korteweg-De Vries equation with localized damping have been studied by Pazoto [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4, inspired by an argument developed in Pazoto [16] for KdV problem, which was used before for linear, time invariant wave and plate equations respectively by Rauch and Taylor [18] and Zuazua [27], we prove a gain of regularity for solutions of the problem (K) with u xx (0, t) = 0 that vanish on a subset ω contained in (0, L).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to apply the unique continuation property results in [17] on smooth solutions to conclude that u = 0. Later on, performing as in [9], the general case was solved in [11] showing that solutions vanishing on any subinterval are necessarily smooth, which yields enough regularity on u to apply the unique continuation results obtained in [15]. More recently, L. Rosier and B.-Y.…”
Section: Multiplying (11) By U and Integrating In (0 L) We Getmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows applying the unique continuation property results in [27] on smooth solutions to conclude that u = 0. The general case, that is, the case in which the function a = a(x) is active in any open subset of (0, L) was first solved in [19] for the scalar KdV equation (1.12) and boundary conditions as in (1.2). Combining the multiplier techniques developed in [22] and the so-called "compactness-uniqueness arguments" (see, for instance, [29]) it was shown that the solutions vanishing on any subinterval of (0, L) are necessarily smooth, which yielded enough regularity on u to apply the unique continuation results obtained in [23] by Carleman inequalities.…”
Section: ||U (· T)||mentioning
confidence: 99%