2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(00)00016-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unique thermoremanent magnetization of multidomain sized hematite: Implications for magnetic anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By normalizing the experimental mineral TRM acquisitions for SD, PSD (pseudo single domain), and MD (multi domain) minerals (Dunlop and Waddington 1975;Kletetschka, Wasilewski, and Taylor 2000;Özdemir and O'Reilly 1982;Tucker and O'Reilly 1980;Wasilewski 1981) we obtain a uniform trend, indicating that magnetic grains of various mineral domain-states and/or mineral types saturate near 20 mT (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: New Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By normalizing the experimental mineral TRM acquisitions for SD, PSD (pseudo single domain), and MD (multi domain) minerals (Dunlop and Waddington 1975;Kletetschka, Wasilewski, and Taylor 2000;Özdemir and O'Reilly 1982;Tucker and O'Reilly 1980;Wasilewski 1981) we obtain a uniform trend, indicating that magnetic grains of various mineral domain-states and/or mineral types saturate near 20 mT (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: New Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because temperatures were not above the Curie temperature of ferrimagnetic pyrrhotite (310 °C), the nature of the stable remanent magnetization is suggested to be not a TRM but seems to be some sort of shock-induced remanent magnetization (SRM) or partial thermoremanent magnetization (pTRM). According to data given by Clark (1983; see also data compilation in Kletetschka et al 2000Kletetschka et al , 2004, single-domain pyrrhotite acquires a ten times higher remanence in small magnetic fields than multidomain pyrrhotite and a nearly equal high one than single-domain magnetite. The data from this study suggest that pyrrhotite acquired a stable remanent magnetization during shockinduced grain size reduction below its T C .…”
Section: Magnetization Mechanism For Pyrrhotitementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Multidomain hematite has higher magnetic coercivity (Hc = 13 mT) than MD magnetite (Hc = 1.8 mT) due to a low demagnetizing energy and, thus, the large amount of pinning energy holding the domain walls in place (Kletetschka et al 2000c). The SD magnetite has larger coercivity (Hc = 19 mT) than MD magnetite due to absence of domain walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%