2012
DOI: 10.2748/tmj/1347369373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness of Sasaki-Einstein metrics

Abstract: In this paper, we shall prove the uniqueness of Sasaki-Einstein metrics on compact Sasaki manifolds modulo the action of the identity component of the automorphism group for the transverse holomorphic structure. This generalizes the result of Cho, Futaki and Ono [5] for compact toric Sasaki manifolds. Introduction.The aim of this paper is to show the uniqueness of Sasaki-Einstein metrics up to the action of the identity component of the automorphism group for the transverse holomorphic structure. A Sasaki man… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…]. If we fix the complex manifold (C, J 0 ) and the scaling vector field r∂ r , then the Calabi-Yau cone structure (g 0 , Ω 0 ) is unique up to scaling and up to the action of Aut T 0 (C) [78,79]. The links of Calabi-Yau cones are called Sasaki-Einstein manifolds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]. If we fix the complex manifold (C, J 0 ) and the scaling vector field r∂ r , then the Calabi-Yau cone structure (g 0 , Ω 0 ) is unique up to scaling and up to the action of Aut T 0 (C) [78,79]. The links of Calabi-Yau cones are called Sasaki-Einstein manifolds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special case of particular interest are the Y p,q structures on S 2 × S 3 which are discussed further in Example 7.6 below. The uniqueness statement in the theorem follows from [NS12] which proves transverse uniqueness, up to transverse holomorphic transformations, then using [MSY08] which proves uniqueness in the Sasaki cone. 6.3.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(in our notation the basic Laplacian has the opposite sign of [17] one). Thus, for any ψ ∈ C ∞ B (M, R) we have:…”
Section: Second Order Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%