2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40622-017-0159-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal access to clean cooking energy and the need for an inclusive policy: evidence from analysis of cooking fuel use in Odisha and Tamil Nadu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme aims to provide LPG connections to 80 million poor households. The Government of India has designed the Clean India movement, or the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, with a massive investment of Rs 90 000 million during 2014‐2017 90 . Earlier, the government launched a number of programs, namely the Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitaran Yojana (RGGLY), Pratyaksh Hanstantrit Labh (PAHAL), and Give it Up for promoting the use of CCF 91 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme aims to provide LPG connections to 80 million poor households. The Government of India has designed the Clean India movement, or the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, with a massive investment of Rs 90 000 million during 2014‐2017 90 . Earlier, the government launched a number of programs, namely the Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitaran Yojana (RGGLY), Pratyaksh Hanstantrit Labh (PAHAL), and Give it Up for promoting the use of CCF 91 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from the sampled literature shows that the majority of the empirical studies have examined opportunities with cooking technologies [117] and how to support the provision and adoption of alternative and clean cooking technologies [e.g. 118,119]. Other studies have focused on traditional biomass such as charcoal [34] as this is a major fuel utilised in urban Africa.…”
Section: Focus On One Technology or Energy Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location has a significant effect on the type of cooking fuel adopted and differences are particularly evident between urban and rural areas [89,90]. Households located in rural areas are less interested in adopting cleaner fuels because of the easier access to alternative biomass sources that are cheaper, whereas in urban and suburban areas the rate of ICS adoption is considerably higher [14,37,91].…”
Section: Location: Urban Versus Ruralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Location: urban vs. rural [14,27,37,38,50,89,91] In urban and suburban areas, the rate of ICS' adoption is higher than in rural areas because of the scarcity of firewood.…”
Section: Drivers and Barriers References General Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%