DOI: 10.17077/etd.fdbe4lzx
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal deformation rings of modules over self-injective algebras

Abstract: Let k be field of arbitrary characteristic and let Λ be a finite dimensional k-algebra. From results previously obtained by F.M Bleher and the author, it follows that if V • is an object of the bounded derived category D b (Λ-mod) of Λ, then V • has a well-defined versal deformation ring R(Λ, V • ), which is complete local commutative Noetherian k-algebra with residue field k, and which is universal provided thatLet Dsg(Λ-mod) denote the singularity category of Λ and assume that V • is a bounded complex whose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of this paper constitutes the Ph.D. thesis of the second author under the supervision of the first author [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this paper constitutes the Ph.D. thesis of the second author under the supervision of the first author [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we now give an introduction to versal deformation rings. Many of our definitions and results are taken from [5] and [16].…”
Section: Morita and Stable Equivalencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of our definitions, results and proof ideas are based on work by Schlessinger [10] and Mazur [8] and on Vélez-Marulanda's thesis [12]. The main difference is that [10], [8] and [12] worked withĈ comm instead ofĈ. This requires us to modify their definitions, results and proof ideas to fit our situation.…”
Section: Chapter 3 Non-commutative Deformation Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noting that e 22 has yet to be defined, we choose to set e 22 = 0. Then we define e 11 as e 11 = e 22 − l 12 = −l 12 , which we obtain by noticing that e 22 − e 11 = (XE − EX) 12 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%