1986
DOI: 10.1051/jphys:019860047090144500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal features of polymer shapes

Abstract: The equilibrium shapes of long chain polymers in a dilute solution in good solvent are investigated Rotationally invariant quantities Δ and S which characterize the average asymmetry and degree of prolate — or oblateness of a polymer configuration are defined These amplitude ratios are proved to be universal, and calculated to first order in an ε = 4 - d expansion. The polymers are shown to be on average quite asymmetric and prolate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
214
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
214
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the shape of a given conformation we use two rotationally invariant quantities S and ∆ that are determined using the inertia tensor [10,11,12,13],…”
Section: Shape Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the shape of a given conformation we use two rotationally invariant quantities S and ∆ that are determined using the inertia tensor [10,11,12,13],…”
Section: Shape Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is two fold: (a) We use ideas familiar in polymer physics [9,10,11] to describe shape parameters of proteins using only the coordinates of the native structure. Examination of the asymmetry in the overall shapes gives insights into the extent to which a protein can tolerate volume mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is bounded to the interval [-0.25, 2] with negative values referring to predominantly oblate shapes and positive values representing prolate molecules [13,14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is difficult to treat analytically. A more tractable approach has been suggested by Aronovitz et al [23] and Rudnick et al [24] based on the definition of the asphericity ∆ D as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%