2004
DOI: 10.1049/el:20040385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal masking on logic gate level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the DTS is large enough, it offers a possibility to DPA attacks to find the key. The use of MUX to realize masked circuits for AND (OR) gates in [4] also incur the same problem.…”
Section: Dissipation Timing Skews (Dts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the DTS is large enough, it offers a possibility to DPA attacks to find the key. The use of MUX to realize masked circuits for AND (OR) gates in [4] also incur the same problem.…”
Section: Dissipation Timing Skews (Dts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete design of AES algorithm with masking at gate-level was presented in [15]. Universal masking for random logic was developed in [4]. However, these masking approaches were shown to be unable to resist DPA attacks in the presence of glitches [8,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various countermeasures that have been proposed in the literature [2]- [10] to protect cryptographic implementations and are employed at the algorithmic level, architecture level, and cell (gate) level. Hiding [2] and masking [3] are amongst the most common countermeasures at cell level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effort to achieve invulnerability against DPA attacks is shifted from the transistor level towards the cell level. This approach involves cell-level masking schemes presented in [30] and [10], as well as dual-rail logic styles like WDDL [29] or MDPL [23]. The security analysis of the masking approaches in [18] and [26] revealed that the occurrence of glitches significantly reduces the resistance against PA attacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%