2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.206601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Properties of Many-Body Localization Transitions in Quasiperiodic Systems

Abstract: Precise nature of MBL transitions in both random and quasiperiodic (QP) systems remains elusive so far. In particular, whether MBL transitions in QP and random systems belong to the same universality class or two distinct ones has not been decisively resolved. Here we investigate MBL transitions in one-dimensional (d = 1) QP systems as well as in random systems by state-of-the-art real-space renormalization group (RG) calculation. Our real-space RG shows that MBL transitions in 1D QP systems are characterized … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also find possible indications of the breakdown of powerlaw behavior in larger systems: the decay becomes faster than a power law with increasing time. Our findings are consistent with the aforementioned predictions of Khemani et al concerning two different universality classes for the MBL transitions with random and quasi-periodic potentials [23] (see also the related study [28]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We also find possible indications of the breakdown of powerlaw behavior in larger systems: the decay becomes faster than a power law with increasing time. Our findings are consistent with the aforementioned predictions of Khemani et al concerning two different universality classes for the MBL transitions with random and quasi-periodic potentials [23] (see also the related study [28]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This transition describes a breakdown of equilibrium statistical mechanics and has many features that distinguish it from phase transitions usually encountered in either quantum or equilibrium classical systems. Despite focused efforts in studying this transition, 19,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] the combination of finite energy density, interactions and disorder remains a challenge to all known theoretical and computational techniques. Much of the insight into the existence of the MBL phase and transition have been obtained by exact diagonalization studies, performed on small system sizes (L 30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a well-known problem for the finite-size scaling analysis of the MBL transition. For the MBL transition in models with short-range interactions, the critical exponent ν extracted from finite-size scaling is about ν = 0.91 ± 0.07 or 0.80 ± 0.04 (for gap statistics or entanglement entropy, up to L = 22 [12]) or ν = 1.09 (for entanglement entropy, up to L = 18 [14]), which is much smaller than the prediction of ν = 3.1±0.3 obtained from the real-space renormalization group analysis [19,20]. The latter satisfies the Harris/CCFS/CLO bound.…”
Section: Finite-size Scalingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…To date, there are a number of techniques developed to understand MBL, including analytic calculations [9], numerically exact diagonalization [8,[10][11][12][13][14], renormalization group approaches such as the excited-state realspace renormalization group and density matrix renormalization groups (DMRG and its time-dependent version tDMRG) [15][16][17][18][19][20], and perturbation methods such as Born approximation [21] and self-consistent theories [22]. Recently, a renormalization flow technique, namely the Wegner-Wilson flow renormalization, has also been applied to investigate the MBL phase transition [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%